Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27
Additional Information — Why Now?
On-line Opinion Magazine…OK, it's a blog
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Additional Information

The wreckage of a US helicopter that was missing in Nepal has been located. Based on the location and an overview of the wreck, there is little hope that any of the 6 Marines and 2 Nepal soldiers on the craft survived.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving ‘Boston bomber’ has been sentenced to death by a unanimous decision of the jury. This will lead to an automatic appeal.

Pistol and Boo have flown back to the US after being threatened with death in Australia. FYI: all a pet dog needs to enter the US is a veterinarian’s certification that all of standard vaccinations are current. Some airlines want proof of a kennel cough vaccination in addition to the standard rabies, parvo, etc. We took our dog with us when we were moved overseas by the military, and it is no big deal outside of Britain and Australia.

The engineer of the train that crashed in Philadelphia met with investigators to officially state that he doesn’t remember the crash. He has plenty of stitches to attest to the diagnosis of concussion.

6 comments

1 Shirt { 05.16.15 at 11:48 am }

Additional information:
Via the Mahablog, a link to the Gyrocopter dude, his explanation of why he did it.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/i-flew-a-gyrocopter-onto-the-capitol-lawn-to-save-our-democracy/2015/05/15/072590ae-fb0d-11e4-9030-b4732caefe81_story.html

I admit to being irritated by him for pointing out another weakness at the capital but I must also admit his intent was certainly honorable.

2 Bryan { 05.16.15 at 7:27 pm }

The weakness was known and there isn’t a lot that can be done about it. Almost any reaction will result in major collateral damage, not only to people but to major national monuments. Face it, taking out a couple of dozen Japanese tourists and destroying the Lincoln Memorial is not something any law enforcement agency wants on their ledger, if it is done to stop one lone individual who has no weapons.

I understand the guy’s point and even agree with him. It is really frustrating that you have to resort to such extremes before anyone pays attention to you.

3 Steve Bates { 05.17.15 at 8:30 am }

In principle I oppose the death penalty in all cases. But I freely admit that someone like Tsarnaev tests my resolve to the limit. I certainly won’t spend any time or emotional energy mourning him; he’s a truly reprehensible excuse for a human being. Hell, he’d be a reprehensible excuse for a cockroach…

4 Bryan { 05.17.15 at 8:56 pm }

I support the concept of the death penalty, but the reality is totally dysfunctional. The ‘life without parole’ sentence is cheaper and, in many ways, just a final as the death sentence, with the advantage that it provides real closure. With the death sentence the case will be rehashed at the appeals and at the actual execution. With ‘life without parole’ the criminal disappears into a supermax, never to be heard from again.

5 Badtux { 05.19.15 at 12:17 am }

My problem with the death penalty is that it’s too easy, and too cheap (assuming we give up all these appeals and such and decide to implement it the same way as China, with a bullet to the head in the courtyard of the prison a few days after the sentence is declared). I want punishment to be expensive because that’s how we keep society from declaring huge swathes of the population to be criminals and punishing them — the cost of doing so would buckle state budgets if they have to pay for actual prison cells and guards rather than just the cost of bullets. Thus you get situations like here in California where the state budget was being buckled by the thousands imprisoned by the War on Drugs, and as a result the state has basically decriminalized a bunch of drug-related misdemeanors and non-violent felonies and opened the jail cells of those prisoners and said “you’re free, go home.” (As if). Which would *never* happen if “justice” was the cost of a bullet in the courtyard, they would have instead given the death penalty for stealing a Snickers bar because that would be cheaper.

6 Bryan { 05.19.15 at 8:56 pm }

Actually the death penalty was pretty much it for centuries in the areas where the basis for the US legal system was developed. Hell, most of the ‘investigative techniques’ were lethal, so being accused was a death sentence.

The county was more than decade out of sync with the need for prison space, and then started creating laws to fill prisons that were surplus when they were opened. They built a new prison on Otay Mesa in San Diego County and then discovered they didn’t have the money to turn on the lights, much less hire guards. It was incredible that they built the damn thing before they determined those issues.

Actually, I don’t think the US criminal justice system is capable of producing the certainty necessary for execution.