But to the point – I estimate that a good 80% of our male membership over the age of 80 (not many of those left) are WWII vets. We even have a few Korean War vets and a couple who saw service in Viet Nam. They are all good, peaceable Quaker gentlemen who wouldn’t hurt a fly.
But they saw a legitimate need for military service at the time, and answered the call.
To my knowledge – and as I’m the meeting secretary, I should know – we only have one member on active duty or in the reserves at the moment…he’s in the Coast Guard in Minnesota. Apparently, nobody is seeing a legitimate need to put aside their Peace Testimony at this time.
]]>There is something about the concept of evangelical Quakers that is dissonant, a “ripple in the Force”.
People forget, Lark, that the second version of the Klan attacked Jews, Catholics, and immigrants, as well as blacks. America hasn’t been majority WASP for some time, but people refuse to accept that reality.
When of the things that is bothering the Religious Reich is the fact that they are not growing with the population. The membership in the Southern Baptist Convention has been flat for a decade.
]]>There are several branches of Quakers, including — get this — evangelical Quakers who also have a clergy and spoken service. I think Mrs. Nixon was from that group. They are an off-shoot of the original “orthodox” Quakers from Philadelphia, which is the branch I align with.
]]>Van, that’s the problem: some Christians keep complaining about persecution but, most of the world can’t figure out what they mean beyond the fact that they aren’t a government funded organization. They just held a big conference down your way that all kinds of politicians attended to complain about “the war on Christians”.
]]>I mean, isn’t there still a Christian majority in this country?
]]>And yes, there are plenty of Quaker veterans. Not all of us are Conscientious Objectors, and many served in the armed forces in non-combat or service duties.
]]>