Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Necromancer? https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/07/necromancer/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:17:54 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/07/necromancer/comment-page-1/#comment-14011 Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:54:19 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/07/necromancer/#comment-14011 It’s annoying that there are an awful lot of people on both sides of any issue who are much more worthy of being given time in spotlight this individual.

Bill Buckley and I disagree about almost everything, but he can, at least, string together words in a meaningful sentence. Some of those words might be chosen for pretentious reasons, but they often reflected a very precise meaning.

Jane Fonda is an example on the other side. She was a B-list starlet with no real grounding in political science. She had a right to her opinion, but no standing to represent any major position.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/07/necromancer/comment-page-1/#comment-14006 Thu, 08 Jun 2006 17:59:54 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/07/necromancer/#comment-14006 There’s an anagram of that person’s name floating around the ‘sphere that suggests she is not biologically female. I’ve known some transgendered people through Democratic Party circles, and I assert that associating that person with any of them in any way whatsoever is a scurrilous slander of the worst sort.

But let her speak unimpeded. It isn’t our cause that she embarrasses when she opens her mouth. I doubt the public can be persuaded, in the long run, that hate is a family value.

]]>