Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Analogies Are Dangerous https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:27:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16315 Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:27:12 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16315 Condi wrote a book on Eastern Europe under the Soviets, and frankly it stunk, but I don’t think anyone fact checks any of the Shrubbery’s speeches.

My Dad was stationed at Bitburg in the late 50’s, and an uncle “drove through” the area with a guy named Patton in the 40’s, so the history of that ground was not unknown. Some people think history is whatever they want it to be.

]]>
By: djhlights https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16314 Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:43:01 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16314 Considering his Secretary of State is supposed to be an expert on the Cold War and the USSR this makes the State Department a laughing stock. Fox News nearly anointed her the heir to George Kennan back in 2000 when she was chosen to be National Security Advisor, yet her staff and his don’t know their history well enough to not mix metaphors.

It reminds me of this for some reason.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16313 Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:04:36 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16313 LBJ was a real Texan. If he wasn’t sure, he asked his wife who had no problem keeping him straight. No one has ever disciplined the Shrubbery about anything since he left the National Guard, which was probably one of the main reasons he left.

He’s an embarrassment to anyone associated with him.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16311 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:39:04 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16311 Bryan, Texans suffer more than most, because people assume that Bush’s behavior is conditioned by life on the ranch. I’ve known a few ranch hands and farmers in my time, including a couple of genuine cowboys, and none of them would tolerate the degree of rudeness Bush inflicts on other world leaders. Maybe he picked up the habit because he’s a spoiled brat from an obscenely wealthy family, but if he’d had my mother (herself a farmer’s daughter), he would have learned not to talk that way. It makes me sick just to think of the image of America… and incidentally of Texas… he projects to the world. Natalie Maines got it right.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16302 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:35:34 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16302 His behavior is just weird. It’s rude, and he has to know it’s rude, but he does it anyway.

There are people in the White House and State Department whose entire function is to prevent this kind of thing from happening. Protocol officers throughout the American government are probably becoming alcoholics trying to survive in this environment.

When are people going to notice that he doesn’t get invited back to any country. After one visit they make sure it never happens again.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16300 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:32:53 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16300 If boorish behavior in a diplomatic setting were a crime, Bush would surely be convicted and assessed life without parole. Instead, we are the ones who suffer for the diplomatic atrocities he commits against world leaders.

I would hide my head in shame, but I don’t think it would do any good. When I removed my hands from my eyes, Bush would still be Bush, giving nicknames to heads of state, dragging them by the sleeve across the stage, etc. All I can do is hope that at some point the very Earth itself is offended, and opens a chasm that swallows him up, leaving all the foreign leaders around him standing, nodding their heads.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16298 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:16:57 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16298 None are so blind as those who will not see…

]]>
By: andante https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16297 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:14:49 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16297 I take it you’ve seen this roundup of his latest European boorishness?

For old time’s sake, I’ll just assume there are still some people in the White House and/or at Foggy Bottom who actually understand & appreciate protocal, basic good manners, and cultural sensibilities.

With that assumption – when did Bush listen to experts on anything?

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16295 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:41:09 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16295 I believe that he has the most incompetent staff ever hired to work for any executive in modern times. Staff people are supposed to check and verify these things and prevent the “boss” from making a fool of themselves. It is made worse by the fact that he’s not as bright as a turkey, but a real staff would prevent these things.

]]>
By: andante https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-16293 Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:33:09 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/06/22/analogies-are-dangerous/#comment-16293 It really makes you wonder what Yale is telling their history majors. Or more likely – how Bush ever managed to get a degree.

Never mind.

Anyway, this statement struck me as just another way of saying “Bring ’em on”.

]]>