Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:40:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/comment-page-1/#comment-17815 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:40:42 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/#comment-17815 Michael has his usual thorough coverage of context on the issue, and it was simply a lack of attention to how his words could be perceived to others. But that inattention is important because he speaks as the leader of the largest Christian denomination in the world. There are people ready to leap on any error and magnify it.

]]> https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/comment-page-1/#comment-17814 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:54:37 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/#comment-17814 Equally amazing that a man supposedly Christ’s Vicar on earth can’t imagine walking in another man’s shoes.

]]> https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/comment-page-1/#comment-17808 Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:28:45 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/#comment-17808 A lot of people never make the successful transition from being a power in the background to being a public spokesman. It’s amazing how many academics can’t put two words together in a meaningful way in front of an audience.

]]> https://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/comment-page-1/#comment-17803 Sun, 17 Sep 2006 04:53:08 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2006/09/16/life-is-good-for-osama/#comment-17803 You’re right. He should be well rested since he doesn’t seem to have to be staying one step ahead of the hunters. As for the pope, again you are correct. He’s not sorry for saying it, just for how some might interpret it.

]]>