Many people skip the criminal law and sue in civil court over this type of behavior and if it takes place as part of employment there are sexual harassment regulations that come to the fore.
Because this is Congress, and Congress has a nasty habit of exempting itself from laws, the only real avenue open is a criminal complaint in the local jurisdiction of the receiver for adults. People don’t usually bother, but the laws are in place and available if people want to use them.
Since Foley identifies his location as Florida in some of the messages, he could be charged under a rather nasty Florida law if the Feds don’t prosecute.
The main reason these laws aren’t used is the problem of identifying the source of the e-mails. In this case, the source is known, so the prosecution could go forward.
]]>Many are calling for resignations, and that would be a very good move for the Republican Party, because this isn’t going away.
]]>Thank you for pointing out an important distinction.
I concur that the core issue is the lack of consent. However, if Greenwald’s interpretation of the federal statute is correct, the fact that the page was under 18 makes Foley’s actions a federal crime.
On another note, one wonders if those who believed that Paula Jones suffered sexual harassment from then-Governor Clinton will be as quick to call for the resignations of those who covered up Mr. Foley’s crimes. (I shan’t hold my breath waiting for Ann Coulter to offer pro bono legal services for the page harassed by Mr. Foley.)
]]>