Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Serial Commas https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:45:37 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Brad Stribling https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/comment-page-1/#comment-20119 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:45:37 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/#comment-20119 Me, I prefer the use of the serial comma. As others have said, it better correlates with the natural spoken cadence. And, being an engineer, I find it’s use helps to dispell any possible Boolean connection between the last two items in the list, e.g., “grits, bacon and eggs.” I’ve often ordered the eggs without bacon (but the grits are mandatory).

I’m surprised at how many people agonize over this, in trying to not use incorrect English, instead of dealing with more important matters such as avoiding the split infinitive.

Brad

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/comment-page-1/#comment-19706 Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:14:14 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/#comment-19706 I was going to write something about settling the issue with a duel, but that might turn colons into semicolons and that would be rather messy.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/comment-page-1/#comment-19705 Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:28:02 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/#comment-19705 Seriously, it doesn’t usually matter, but lists with consistent separators are easier to parse, by machine or by eye. I’d omit the “and” if they’d let me. 🙂

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/comment-page-1/#comment-19704 Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:25:14 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/#comment-19704 I’d like to thank my parents, Mother Teresa and the Pope.

]]>
By: jamsodonnell https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/comment-page-1/#comment-19699 Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:15:32 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/#comment-19699 Hmm will we see blood in the streets or fatwas issued by the Arch-punctuator of Harvard? I agree with Anya: use it to prevent ambiguity but otherwise it is superfluous

]]>
By: Anya https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/comment-page-1/#comment-19696 Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:55:58 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/#comment-19696 Um… I’m a not-serial-comma user, as a rule, unless the extra comma would prevent an ambiguity. On the other hand, the Professor hates commas and refuses to use them at all. Therefor, he writes the same way that he speaks — all in a breathless rush.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/comment-page-1/#comment-19694 Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:15:21 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/01/14/serial-commas/#comment-19694 As I mentioned somewhere in a comment on my site (probably on the post about British mysteries, because Colin Dexter’s character Inspector Morse was so insistent on the “Oxford comma”), my programmer’s soul longs for the serial comma, but I had avoided it because I thought it was a UK convention only. Following Wolcott’s links a few levels, I learned that various major publishers’ style guides in both America and Britain are all over the place on the issue.

I know not what course others may take, but henceforth you’ll find the serial comma on Steve Bates’s blog. (Ah, apostrophe-s-after-s: there’s another punctuation issue for another time…)

]]>