An animal rights activist should realize that it’s much preferable to have orphaned cubs in zoos, than animals born in the wild. There aren’t enough polar bears left that the world can afford to “throw away” a genetically unique individual.
]]>That is pretty much what all carnivores do in captivity, Anya, the relentless pacing without any ability to make that burst of running that is their survival in the wild. Feeding them doesn’t remove their instincts, and Knut will not always be small and cuddly. Soon his play will have major consequences on his playmates, but he will, at least, be comfortable in his confinement, not having known the expanses of the tundra.
]]>The poor creature was displayed in a cage about the size of my livingroom, with a small pool. He would walk forward, and then back up, forward and back, forward and back all day long. Not a good situation for any animal, much less a bear. Zoo science and technology certainly has come a long way since. Not a perfect situation, but a hell of a lot better than Benson’s.
However, if the Global Climate change deniers have their way, the zoos will be the only place on the planet will be able to survive.
With luck, humans won’t have to join them there…
]]>It is better to stock zoos with animals from zoos rather than the wild, and better that they are taught that life in a zoo is “normal”. I’ve seen captured animals at the San Diego Zoo, and they have trouble adapting to captivity.
]]>If he were wild-born, and destined to be released, that would be a different story.
Mr. Albrecht has his head up his ass.
]]>