The FMJs are claiming moral authority and/or expertise that just doesn’t exist in their experience or education. Some guy with a microphone has no more standing than some guy with a web site, when it comes to authority or knowledge. The Biblical test for a false prophet is pretty good advice, no matter your religion – is what they say true?
]]>It’s all image for people in the media.
]]>These folks are not deserving of respect – nor the Microphone to amplify their poor attitudes (or Money thrown at them for doing so!) And whether they assuage their guilt with good works doesn’t excuse the racist comments or allow them a license to spew!
🙂
]]>What have these people done in life that qualifies them to be considered any better informed or worthy of notice than carnival barkers?
]]>I am always astonished at how much power the talking heads and radio jocks, shock and otherwise, have just because they’re on the air. I don’t podcast because I write far better and more fluently than I talk, but that doesn’t mean the fast talkers have well-reasoned opinions more often than I do. I can welcome an audience and announce the next piece to be performed (and, with more reluctance, make a fundraising pitch for the sponsoring org), or conduct a software design review meeting, but that’s about the extent of my public speaking skills. Public speaking is an art and a craft, respectable in itself, but not deserving of more respect for the speaker’s ideas.
]]>A popularity contest is not a great way to hire someone, and that’s what an election amounts to anymore. After they are in office, they have to show they can do the job.
Talking on the radio or television is no proof of anything other than you can talk. It doesn’t entitle you to any special privileges or consideration.
]]>