Norway would work, but a North Sea platform would be the best solution for a lot of reasons.
Detection isn’t the real problem, it’s the interception phase that isn’t workable.
]]>If they were serious about basing options, the tip of Scotland or a platform in the North Sea would be better sites, so the debris would fall in the water, not on European Russia or Scandanavia, if it were an Iranian missile.
]]>The Shrubbery is wondering around the world kicking anthills and some of those ants bite.
]]>If only we could persuade Bush to listen to someone like that who has been through hell, before he puts the whole world through hell again…
]]>