The change to American bureaucrats since 9/11 has been a major PITA. Simple things have become a matter of “national security” and everything must be taken more seriously as we are all possible terrorists.
They are making getting information a bigger problem than ever, while releasing classified information for political reasons.
]]>Exactly, Bobby, no one is saying a health care provider has to accept payment from a single payer system, any more than they are required to accept Medicare. Doctors and hospitals can refuse the patients except in an emergency.
The only problem with the French system, Fallenmonk, is that it is French. Our oldest ally and people freak out about them. Now, I don’t have a lot of use for Parisians, but that’s based on personal experience. OTOH, there is good food and drink to be had outside of Paris, and friendly people.
Andante, you can buy private insurance all over Europe and in Canada. You can go to medical facilities that are not part of the taxpayer systems, and wealthy people do, but everyone can go to the regular systems and things that become expensive emergencies in the US, are handled cheaply by doctor’s visits in most countries.
Steve, even the best insurance runs into the cost cutting by for-profit hospitals. The understaffing is absurd and dangerous. The mistakes made by overworked people are too often fatal. The system is broken. You are better off, financially and in terms of care, to go on a cruise ship, than go to a hospital.
]]>The “free streets” argument is particularly offensive. In Houston, as in most cities, streets are a government responsibility, but I don’t see any road contractors going hungry. Indeed, they do rather better than the rest of us. It helps to have city government in your pocket, um, I mean, good lobbyists. (Aside: why no strikethrough tags in comments?)
(Speaking of Ron Paul, when he was the only OB/GYN in Brazoria County, TX, he refused to take Medicare or Medicaid patients. Reportedly he was charitable with his services to people who could not afford them, but a fair system would not place that decision with a doctor. Healthcare is a right, not a privilege, not something to be doled out as largesse by individual physicians. I take that fact about Paul as a statement of his attitude about single-payer healthcare.)
]]>Not having seen the movie or read much at all about it, I don’t know if the reviewer is correct or (more likely) making up sh$t.
Much as they deserve it, I haven’t heard any reasonable plan that calls for the abolishing of private insurers. Yes, single-payer would somewhat halt their gravy train, but they could still provide supplemental insurance and make a pretty penny.
Medicare doesn’t cover every buck, and neither would single-payer. I’m sure the private insurers would be quite happy to step in, and most folks would be quite happy to buy their supplemental policies.
]]>Ot, Bryan, I’m tagging you:
http://rantsfromtherookery.blogspot.com/2007/06/tagged.html