There are those who would claim that the existence of religious wars is prima facie evidence that there must be multiple gods or no god.
While I’m not sure that I would work hand in glove with the UU on an enemies list based on religion, I will assuredly work against anyone who claims special privilege based on their religion.
]]>Article VI takes religion out as a possible qualification for office. That does not dispose of the question you ask, Bryan, but it ought to be a clue. How long will it be before our current Supremes eviscerate that part of the Constitution as well?
I will use a candidate’s religion only as a disqualification, and then only if the candidate states, or I suspect, that in office s/he would deviate from our tradition of secular government and religious pluralism in society, on the basis of her or his religion. Some candidates make me nervous, I must admitt. Um, admit… that’s what I meant, admit.
For an example of what can happen when people are deeply committed to implementing their own religions in the fabric of society… based on small differences, from our viewpoint… one need only look at Iraq. I guess I should start contemplating now who exactly I want to blow up for not being UU, so I’ll be ready when the sectarian violence begins. Seriously, that way lies chaos, as our founders understood from firsthand experience.
]]>