Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Dear Congresscritters: https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:55:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28375 Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:55:26 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28375 Steve, it would be a great thing if there were, in fact, at least three viable parties in this country. Two is not enough to keep these people honest.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28357 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:10:44 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28357 “Bipartisanship is sometimes a necessary tactic. It is never a philosophy of governance. Otherwise, why have two parties?” – Robert Kuttner

(Posted with full awareness that there are, at least in theory, more than two parties.)

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28345 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:46:01 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28345 The success of failure of any form of compromise has to based on the actual results. If the results are bad, it was a bad compromise. Compromise is a tactic, not a goal.

]]>
By: whig https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28336 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:31:42 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28336 I may be overstating my case. I’m prone to do so on occasion, according to my wife, but I would retract it and say that some instances of bipartisanship may be genuinely good. I’m just really tired of it being treated as presumptively good.

]]>
By: whig https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28335 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:27:23 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28335 Bipartisanship means lets you and me screw the voters.

]]>
By: whig https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28334 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:26:50 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28334 Bipartisanship only happens when partisans aren’t paying attention. In other words, if they could just get the liberal and conservative bloggers to go away and shut up….

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28327 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:40:27 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28327 The truth is impeachment is easier than overriding a veto as you only need a two-thirds vote in the Senate.

They keep acting like the “bipartisan fairy” is going to pop into view and wave a wand and restore comity in the halls of Congress. It’s not going to happen. The Repubs are going to block everything possible to paint the Dems as do nothings.

]]>
By: whig https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/comment-page-1/#comment-28321 Wed, 08 Aug 2007 03:14:37 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/08/07/dear-congresscritters/#comment-28321 And it only requires a majority of the house to impeach. They may want to be sure that he’s not going to skate in the senate, but it’s not up to them to try the case. That’s the senate’s job.

The question is whether they believe high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed and if so, they should impeach. Otherwise they aren’t doing their jobs.

]]>