Comments on: Sort Of Good News From Iran

By: News Update

News Update — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:03:58 +0000

Daily News Update…

Iran frees US-Iranian scholaron bail today…

By: Bryan

Bryan — Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:27:46 +0000

The good news, such as there is, would be that Rafsanjani will be harder to sucker that the hardest-liners such as Yazdi and Ahmedinejad, but the people planning this stupidity should understand that he will also do a much better job of ensuring there is a very nasty response to any attack.

Former president Khatami was the last, best chance for a reasonable outcome, and the US blew it by ignoring the assistance that Iran offered. Khatami received nothing but more demands for his efforts, so there will be no more forthcoming.

Arming the Sunni tribes is as dumb as it comes. These guys aren’t like the Hopi, they are like Mafia families. Their problem with AQI was that it was cutting into their “traditional” rights, like extortion and highway robbery. I can almost guarantee that half of the “tips” about “al Qaeda”, actually involve rival tribes and settling old scores, as happened in Afghanistan.

By: Badtux

Badtux — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:07:08 +0000

According to one of Juan Cole’s regular Iran commentators, Rafsanjani is no more pro-American than anybody else in Iran these days, and has been directly involved in making preparations for the American invasion of Iran that everybody there is expecting. The fact that he is a pragmatic leader rather than a dogmatic leader does not mean anything insofar as the basic stance of Iran vis a vis the United States. The current U.S. tilt towards the Sunni side in the ongoing Iraqi Civil War has seriously ticked off pretty much everybody in Iran, even the “moderates”.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:27:24 +0000

Possibly “whew” and if it prevented someone from going over the precipice, although I seem to remember that a bag of wool is the traditional answer, Whig.

So far, Jams, they have avoided the model of the French Revolution, but I’m not counting on it. Things are in a very delicate balance. Left to their own devices, the people of Iran would probably move towards a less hostile country, but the hard-liners will exploit every threat, real or perceived.

By: jams o donnell

jams o donnell — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:34:36 +0000

Iranian politics seem to have oscillated between the hard line fundamentalists and the slightly fmore pragmatic sort. Not a huge step in the right direction for the people of Iran but Rafsanjani is a much less worse choice that his opponent. (jams o donnell speaks the blindingly obvious again!)

By: whig

whig — Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:03:26 +0000

What is the sound of one hand clapping?

By: Bryan

Bryan — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:27:13 +0000

It’s better than the alternative, but more of a Stalin to Khrushchev thing than a real march to reality.

By: Steve Bates

Steve Bates — Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:55:34 +0000

A more moderate leader, and even “a minimal shift to the rational” … I like those ideas; could we have those things here in America? Seriously, anything that will crank down the rhetoric spewing from the mouths of “leaders” here and in Iran lately is all to the good. It’s after Labor Day now, and there’s a “product” I very much don’t want to see rolled out.