If they were talking about a hydroelectric dam, I would pause a couple of minutes before rejecting it. We are probably going to see droughts on the upstream portions, so the water supply wouldn’t be consistent enough to depend on it.
You have to be an expert to blow a dam, and setting the charges takes a while. The gypsum is going to dissolve anyway, so there’s no real point in doing it. The problem is more one of the dam moving, rather than braking.
]]>The Trinity River Dam appears to be properly designed and constructed, though that is a recent condition: it suffered severe damage a few years ago, and was rebuilt the way it should have been built in the first place. But there is no way I’d live in the Trinity River flood plain. Too many have lost their homes when the dam was opened as a last resort.
You are right. There is no reason to blow up a dam that is pretty well guaranteed to fail because of its design or construction… unless there is symbolic value in its deliberate destruction. Insurgents’ motives are frequently irrational. Other people’s motives are… well, they’re frequently irrational, too.
]]>