Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Can’t Win For Losing https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:50:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30910 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:50:02 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30910 Actually, most of the “research” needed has been done and we have moved from science to engineering. They production costs need to come down, put that will only happen when the volume of production increases.

A lot of experiments need to be conducted to find the missing pieces, but we already know which pieces are missing and that’s the hard part.

]]>
By: Fallenmonk https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30902 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 11:21:50 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30902 It is still too cheap all things considered but here in Georgia it hit $2.909 yesterday. I imagine by the weekend it will be over three bucks. It was $2.699 on Monday. Another few bucks a gallon and we might see some investment in alternative transportation and some serious research into alternative energy sources.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30893 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:22:38 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30893 That’s 12¢/gallon cheaper than here, today. The price has jumped a dime in the last week.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30887 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:18:26 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30887 Again in a fit of prescience, I wrote appropriate doggerel back in September 2004, when oil first peaked over $50 a barrel. That fact and $2.67 (or thereabouts) will get me a gallon of regular unleaded in my neighborhood… I can’t run my car on doggerel.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30884 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:56:54 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30884 The price of gasoline jumped up this week, supposedly in response to an increase in the price of oil, but the report says that the stock of gasoline actually rose 1.3 million barrels. The “law” of supply and demand says that this should cause the price of gasoline to fall, but oil and the corporations that deal in it don’t obey any laws. In addition the price is for oil delivered in December, so there is no change for the oil that has been delivered for refining today, but it is an excuse to raise prices.

Notice how everything is an excuse to raise prices.

While trying to deal with the mortgage crisis, the Fed is screwing up everything else. Send out the auditors and clean up this mess.

Instead of the Resolution Trust that was set up to clean up the S&L mess, Congress should create the Financial Inquisition with the power to use “enhanced interrogation” techniques on the officers and boards of the mortgage lenders. The guilty should be hung from gallows outside their corporate offices as an object lesson to others – real penalties for real crimes with millions of victims.

]]>
By: Keith https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30883 Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:34:18 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30883 Why do I get the feeling it’s 1927 instead of 2007?

]]>
By: whig https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30882 Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:59:53 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30882 An interest rate cut means it’s cheaper to borrow money which theoretically increases inflation and causes prices to rise. Cetera paribus and all that.

]]>
By: Jack K., the Grumpy Forester https://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/comment-page-1/#comment-30879 Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:48:31 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/2007/10/31/can-win-for-losing/#comment-30879 …I never did apply myself properly to all those required economics classes in college. I blame that for being the reason I can’t come up with any useful understanding of why the drop in the prime would affect the price of crude…

]]>