The gold standard is the understanding that those with gold set the standards and everyone else lives in poverty. Using gold is no more “real” than using paper, Gold has no great inherent qualities and is worth what people are willing give you for it, just like paper. Gold was in use in Alaska when I lived there, and one sneeze at the wrong time could cost you a week’s wages because you need gold dust to make small purchases.
It isn’t constant, isn’t convenient, and doesn’t make a lot of sense. It is another dream from an earlier age.
]]>The Paul signs are always on residential property, and those I’ve seen are solely in front of the old ‘mill houses’ that used to house the lower-middle class mill workers. They’ve come down a notch or two in the last decade.
I take the Ron Paul “phenom” as an indication that a lot of Republicans and Indies like his “out of Iraq” message as opposed to the rest of the bloodthirsty field. And I’m betting 90% of them don’t know anything else about him, while probably 99% have no clue what the gold standard would be.
]]>I agree Ron Paul is different… but not in a good way. Steer clear of him. This is advice from the guy who told everyone to steer clear of George W. Bush. Do you understand this time?
]]>I would expect the same reaction, for the same reason, Hipparchia, in the northern part of the county, but it is not as prevalent along the coast. These are standard, professional political signs, so there’s some money involved, and they are in yards, not on the right-of-way, which is also somewhat unusual.
He has obviously touched a chord, Jill, and people tend to hear what they want to hear, and see what they want to see. It’s unusual in that he hasn’t had the media attention or advertising of the Perot campaign, for example, which did well locally.
The polling is getting more and more skewed by the “great disconnect,” more and more people cutting loose from landlines and going cellular. If he appeals to a younger group of people, they are more likely not to have a landline telephone for the polling companies to call. His support is more likely to show up in Internet polls, which suffer a similar skewing.
Texans warned people about the Shrubbery, but they didn’t listen, FM. If he should get the nomination, he will come under scrutiny for his record, and everyone can play Condi with “no one could have imagined…”
]]>What I don’t understand is that if he can raise all these millions of dollars, why isn’t he higher up in the polls? Is it that pollsters don’t contact these people or what?
]]>it didn’t really strike me as too far out of character. i ‘ve been reading that he’s the darling of the white supremacy crowd and there are a bunch of them in my neck of the woods.
]]>