Comments on: Party Discipline

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:12:23 +0000

Apparently they don’t think they can win if they have any core values. This is a virus spread by the Beltway crowd, especially the DLC, this is also the main reason that Democrats are considered weak on national defense, because they won’t even defend themselves.

By: Kryten42

Kryten42 — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:54:37 +0000

There are things that you do not triangulate or compromise on because they are the core of your beliefs. If everything is on the table, nothing has any value.

You know… if you ran for office, I’d become an American citizen just so I could vote for you!;) 😀 Hell… I think half the World might! LOL

*sigh* How come you, I and a whole lot of people *out here* can see that, but most of those *in there* can’t?

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:10:41 +0000

There are things that you do not triangulate or compromise on because they are the core of your beliefs. If everything is on the table, nothing has any value.

By: Kryten42

Kryten42 — Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:44:27 +0000

It is truly annoying that Obama and Clinton are ready, willing, and able to beat up on each other, but won’t put up any kind of resistance to the other side. Hah!! You just described the spineless Dem's (with a few notable exceptions, Nancy NOT being one of them!) Watching the Dem's is like watching a classic University lecture on "Battered Housewife Syndrome" (Or Battered Spouse Syndrome I believe it is now). A big BAH!!! to the lot of them!

By: Bryan

Bryan — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:37:38 +0000

Ah, yes, the years of protest voting because nothing you did could change the “good ol’ boy” culture of Southern politics.

It is truly annoying that Obama and Clinton are ready, willing, and able to beat up on each other, but won’t put up any kind of resistance to the other side.

Obama made a strong speech against the war when he was an Illinois state senator, but he meekly voted to support everything the Shrubbery wants now that his voice and vote can make a difference in the US Senate.

Clinton tries to kick that ball every time the Repubs tee it up.

That’s how Kerry lost in 2004 – he wouldn’t fight, he wouldn’t get angry and go to town on liars.

By: andante

andante — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:18:31 +0000

As far as I’m concerned, Hillary is just Bill except not willing to go eyeball-to-eyeball with the likes of Newt Gingrich. And caving to Big Pharma.

Obama? I’d love to have him for a next door neighbor, and that’s about all I know about him.

Edwards of course – not a serious candidate.

North Carolina’s primary is “open” to unaffiliated voters. Up until 2004 when I switched to Islamofascistleftistcommie, I always exited the booth having voted for Pat Buchanan or Alan Keyes or whichever Republican whacko seemed least sane.

If nothing else, it threw a middle finger to the media if My Man got one more extra vote than pundits predicted.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:40:36 +0000

I’m not voting for any Republicans, no matter what the official Initial is after their name. Oh, Mike Gravel, well Mike is a little bit erratic. John McKay has mentioned Mike years in elected office in Alaska, and I remember most of the stories from 4 decades in the past.

By: hipparchia

hipparchia — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:34:18 +0000

i remember finding that political compass of the candidates back when i was trying to convince some ronpaulbot that dennis kucinich was more libertarian then ron paul ever was.

what this country needs is a kucinich/gravel administration. that would be a change.