A cabinet post is insulting, especially concerning health care which is one of the few areas where the two of them actually differ. Cabinet officers implement the President’s policies. You are suggesting that Clinton implement Obama’s policy on an issue she has been involved with for almost two decades, and you don’t understand that it is an insult.
She is on the Senate armed services committee and has traveled in both war zones, but you didn’t suggest Secretary of Defense.
I know you don’t get it. You don’t mean anything by it, but you are definitely going to tick people off with your off-hand remarks, and don’t have the sensitivity to know why.
]]>Snark aside, she has the decision to make. It isn’t up to you or me right now.
]]>Think about it – that’s why there will be no unifying.
]]>I don’t worry about trends. I’ve been out of this for months because of what the DNC did to me and the state of Florida. The treatment that the Florida situation received from other so-called progressive bloggers, just confirmed that my decision was correct.
Your man has to reach out to the voters he and his campaign have alienated, and there is no indication that he knows how to do that, or if it is even possible.
Clinton will support the party, as she always has, but I doubt she has the ability to convince people to return.
]]>This is going to be a nasty, low turnout election, and “the rules” are the reason why.
]]>Note that I don’t have any delusions about Obama. You say he’s a machine politician. Well, he was successful in Chicago politics, so that is a given. His health care plan is nothing but pandering, his attacks upon Clinton’s health care plan were dishonest, and in general I view him as just another Democratic politician, “change” rhetoric nonwithstanding. He has demonstrated that he is intelligent and chooses good staff, but nobody ever accused Clinton of being an idiot either (but Clinton certainly has been accused of unwarranted loyalty towards long-time staffers who haven’t produced — shades of Dubya!). There certainly isn’t anything policy-wise coming out of Obama’s camp that makes any kind of case that he’d be a better President than Hillary. At the moment Obama has the support of more Democrats than Clinton for one and only one reason: Obama spoke out against the Iraq fiasco at the beginning and correctly predicted its outcome, while Clinton voted for it. That’s pretty much it.
But to deny the reality that Obama has the support of more Democrats at this time… (shrug). Sounds like something the tighty righties are always doing (denying reality, that is). And to hand the Presidency to John McCain out of spite (yes, spite), well. We get the government we deserve in the end. Alas.
Now, if you forgive me, it’s time for me to disturb the cat that is sleeping on my lap and go see a man about a bunker :-).
— Badtux the Practical Penguin
]]>