It is only after World War II that the media attempted to claim unbiased reporting, and it has been downhill ever since. The media conglomeration has only made matters worse as the bias is national rather than local or regional.
]]>You wrote: <<No doubt the media is and has been responsible for “distorting the facts and screwing up reality” many times in our history… but I do not think of this occasion as one of those times. >>
I was joking, sort of. Rolling off an 18th century press is a little different from shameless Fox News cablecasts, but the comparison tickled my fancy.
A good view of the Trumbull painting is here. Bryan is right, not everyone shown was actually there, as Wikipedia correctly notes. Hardly any of them, in fact.
]]>They’ve finally located Washington’s first home, and the world will probably discover that there were no cherry trees on the property. The trees in DC are a gift from Japan, not native trees.
Everyone needs a nice creation myth, and no one wants to know which of the Founding Fathers were total SOBs, or how much many hated others.
On the other hand, when you have a group of well off white guys get together and are actually willing to risk life and limb because of government action, things were probably fairly bad.
What they did would be the equivalent of the Congressional Republicans calling for the impeachment of the Shrubbery, and willing to resort to force to get it done.
]]>By the way, I’ve read somewhere (Bryan?) that the Trumbull painting depicts no single real event, but a combination of events in the days described. Does the painting, famous as it is, screw up reality? And I’ve seen the original Bill of Rights in the National Archives; they’re numbered from 1 to 12, not as we conventionally number them. (See the large image on Wikipedia. “Article the third” is the one we conventionally call the First Amendment.) Does our renumbering falsify the rights?
Eyes on the prize, everyone. I hope you have/had a great Fourth… or whatever date it should have been. 🙂
]]>The final draft of the Declaration was referred to the Committee of Five, only two of whom — John Hancock and Charles Thompson — stayed behind in Philadelphia to neatly re-write it in final form. Almost everyone else had left Philadelphia for home.
The final, corrected copy, was transmitted to the printer late the evening of July 3. The first 200 printed copies rolled off the press on July 4. They weren’t read aloud to the public on the steps of Independence Hall until July 8.
John Adams (and others) considered July 2 to be our Independence Day. The quickly-formed popular misconception that July 4 was the day Independence was declared just happens to be the day the Declaration rolled off the press.
I consider this mistake to have been an omen. Forever after, the American media has been distorting the facts and screwing up reality.
]]>Instead of going to hear the concert in the Sunken Gardens or watch the fireworks off the pier, I’m taking a couple of bags of groceries to the Firefighters Command Center for the crews.
]]>Only 199 days to go, Steve.
I’ve suspected I was living in an alternate history since the non-election of 2000, Badtux. This must be Newt’s version of the future.
]]>But given that our brave STASI agents now have clearance to spy on people like these, I’m sure we’ll get no trouble out of them. Gotta go, the national anthem is playing….
God save our gracious Queen,
Long live our noble Queen,
God save the Queen:
Send her victorious,
Happy and glorious,
Long to reign over us:
God save the Queen.
Indeed!
— Badtux the Alternate History Penguin
]]>