Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: A Note https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:53:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38263 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:53:34 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38263 Word does very little that is consistent. It wraps so much insulation around the user in an apparent effort to make it “friendly” that you have to print out a copy to find out what it has done.

]]>
By: LadyMin https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38259 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:50:16 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38259 I’ll agree, early WP for Windows for horrible. Ver5 was just nasty; they did finally get it right with ver6.

In WP you have the “reveal code” feature. You can see the coding and fix the formatting. In Word that function doesn’t exist. That’s what drove me crazy trying to go from WP to Word.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38255 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:22:34 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38255 I know people who swore by it, and others who swore at it. It never did anything for me, but different people work in different ways.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38252 Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:48:54 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38252 During my first encounter with WordPerfect, while I attempted to help a neighbor, I managed to lose the entire content of someone’s (fortunately small) document. Why? Simple: because WordPerfect, unlike every other word processor at the time, did not observe the standard convention for saving files and exiting. Not observing the simplest, most basic conventions of a platform is IMHO a fatal flaw in s/w.

My second encounter was with an early version of WordPerfect for Windows, again in the context of attempting to help someone. The s/w was so buggy that it locked up twice in the few minutes I was using it. Twice. At least we didn’t lose an existing document, because WordPerfect would not run for long enough to create one.

There was no third encounter. And there will not be.

Whatever its purported virtues from a feature standpoint, WordPerfect is, or at least was, simply faulty. MS Word may suck, but it rarely if ever quits on me.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38240 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:46:24 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38240 Ah, but I modified WordStar to work exactly as I worked, and I could never get WordPerfect to do that. I didn’t like using the function keys .

But I dealt with documents in two steps: first I typed the text, then I formatted it. I started in the big iron world and that’s how it was done. WYSIWYG was not a big motivator for me, because it didn’t work all that well until the screens became 1023 X 768 for the printers used as output.

]]>
By: LadyMin https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38238 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:20:20 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38238 I learned data processing on WordStar. For anyone who did a large amount of typing back in the 80s, WordStar was the greatest invention since paper plates. Around 1990 I moved to WP 5.1 Dos. I liked that even better. It was fast and did anything I wanted and did it MY way.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38231 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:36:53 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38231 See, I didn’t know about the dog or the cat, I just ruthlessly eliminated it.

Rook, profound is better that prolost. Give me a break, you do chess matches at your place. I do admit I’m a bit put off that I’ve never attracted a long-term troll, even though I will allow anyone to rant within reason.

MS never showed any respect for the company most responsible for their cash flow. For years their biggest seller was a CPM card for Apple IIs to enable people to run WordStar. MicroPro rested on their laurels and cash cow too long. WordStar/DataStar was the power user solution for mail merging for years.

]]>
By: Kryten42 https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38230 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:20:14 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38230 You can blame MicroPro (WordStar producers) for the dominance of M$ Word! *barf*

Like many other producers of successful DOS applications, WordStar International delayed before deciding to make a version for the commercially successful Windows 3.0. The company purchased Legacy, an existing Windows-based word processor, which was altered and released as WordStar for Windows in 1991. It was a well-reviewed product and included many features normally only found in more expensive desktop publishing packages. However, its delayed launch meant that Microsoft Word had already firmly established itself as the corporate standard during the two previous years.

There is a Wiki for everything! 😉

WordStar Wiki

I was the Aus distro for MicroPro in the 80’s. I still have the CPM disks somewhere in archive. 🙂 Had CalcStar and DataStar… and the other little Star’s too! LOL

]]>
By: Rook https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38229 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:45:42 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38229 You want profound comments here? I didn’t know that. After all these years you finally set a standard.

Damn.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2008/07/22/a-note/comment-page-1/#comment-38228 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:44:15 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=4518#comment-38228 “Profound” means “deep,” right? Some of the stuff I wade into gets pretty deep…

I’ve been reading a lot of mysteries lately, and I just wondered whether, say, Hercule Poirot would look the other way while I murdered Clippy. The only thing worse than Clippy is that damned cat, so of course Stella has substituted it for Clippy… a fact which one of her live kitties actually noticed one time.

]]>