I was there under Deukmejian and Pete Wilson, both Republicans, and both with the very same problem – the whackos didn’t want a balanced budget.
]]>cookie jill´s last blog post..environmental news stories sunday
]]>Heroic stupidity sells a lot of newspapers, so a lot of people die foolishly. It’s amazing the number of statues raised to really bad military leaders.
I would agree, with your Father: they weren’t massacred; they lost the battle. There is not record of quarter being asked, so dying was pretty much the obvious conclusion to the battle.
]]>Dad taught me that “massacre” meant the killing of unarmed civilians by an an armed military force. Most of the defenders of the Alamo were armed and considered themselves a revolutionary army. Though some civilians were killed when the legal army of Mexico overran the fort, most of the deaths were simply soldiers who lost a battle. Add to that, most of what we know about what went on inside the fort during the siege came from civilians who the Mexican army spared and allowed to go free. That both Custer and the Texans were outnumbered by their foes doesn’t change the fact that both battles were proper military engagements. I’ve never heard any reason not to follow Dad’s usage.
Just for the record, Dad was no touchy-feely liberal, like me, he was a cowboy from Montana whose mother survived an attack during the final Sioux War. He just had that sense of fairness that required him to give an honorable enemy his due.
]]>cookie jill´s last blog post..an indication on how sucky it is
]]>Could be worse… one popular song in my youth referred to Daniel Boone at the Alamo. There’s just one problem with that reference…
Steve Bates´s last blog post..The Best Of Intentions
]]>