You can’t get “creative” until you sit on the Supreme Court, because until then you are subject to being overruled.
For me, the big thing is that she has actually tried as a prosecutor and heard as a judge criminal trials. The Supreme Court almost never has anyone with actual criminal law experience, even though that is the basis for most trials in the country.
]]>Lab Kat´s last blog post..In which I start to like Brian
]]>Fallenmonk, She has more experience than anyone currently on the Court when they were nominated, and she has state-level criminal law experience which is totally lacking from the Court.
CK, They are complaining about her “Second Amendment” ruling, which was about nunchuks being illegal in New York. She ruled in favor of states rights, which was the position of the Supreme Court at the time.
]]>I think the abortion issue is much ado about nothing, since this woman has never really made any solid ruling against a woman’s right to choose. She in many ways is a blank slate regarding many matters.
Comrade Kevin´s last blog post..Birth Control Euphemism Delight
]]>fallenmonk´s last blog post..Insanity Rules
]]>hipparchia´s last blog post..[for reference]
]]>