Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: RIP Walter Leland Cronkite 1916-2009 https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:27:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47195 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:27:57 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47195 Blue jeans, sleeveless dresses, birth certificates, “Joe the Plumber”. the weight of the Surgeon General nominee, the outraged religious whacko du jour, the White House dog, haircuts, et cetera ad nauseum.

It’s a good thing we don’t have any wars, economic catastrophes, environmental meltdowns – important things that need coverage so people can understand what in hell is going on, so there is time to copy stories from the supermarket check-out tabloids.

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47192 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:02:30 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47192 Latest story going around the networks about Obama was about Obama’s jeans. Were they baggy, unstylish, or what? And I was just musing about that and trying to imagine Walter Cronkite talking about Obama’s jeans. But my imagination failed. I just can’t imagine Uncle Walter doing any such thing.

How far we have fallen, indeed…

– Badtux the News Penguin

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47189 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:30:19 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47189 In reply to Kryten42.

It essentially shows that Americans have forgotten what a newscaster is under the current corporate reign, because he’s a commentator, not a reporter. I agree that he probably understands the actual news better than the readers on the major outlets, but face it, most of his best stuff is written by people who have been told that they are reporters, rather than the truth – they are comedy writers in need of editors.

Dick Cavett is actually the precursor to Jon Stewart, but most people don’t know who he was.

]]>
By: Kryten42 https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47185 Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:51:33 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47185 Ahem. “I told you so”. ๐Ÿ˜‰ Heh…

Jon Stewart The New Cronkite? Time Poll Shows He’s The Most Trusted Newscaster In America

This is the money comment:

Not to take away from Stewart’s accomplishments, but it does speak volumes about the way the American people view the major networks and their “news” departments — and that they would take the word of a comedian more seriously than high profile, highly paid network news anchors.

Yeah… what I said. Jon (and a few other’s like him) are the old Court Jesters. What a sad world when the only way to get truth in news is via comedy. One thing I like about Jon is that he does real interviews and becomes a *real* reporter when someone of interest releases a book so he can do an on-air *review*. ๐Ÿ˜‰ I sometimes wonder if he has a hand in commissioning some of the books written that appear on TDS. ๐Ÿ˜€ (It really wouldn’t surprise me). And then he get’s serious sometimes (though he may throw in a joke or two to keep in character) when interviewing someone, lake Couric a couple weeks ago. ๐Ÿ™‚

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47021 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:16:03 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47021 He spanned Herbert Hoover and the Depression through Barack Obama as an adult, and kept the faith of the original purpose of journalism – to inform people so they could make their own decisions.

He never gave an opinion while sitting in the news chair, he insisted on rendering all opinions in separate programs. He was an old school straight reporter.

There is no equivalent currently available on television. You either get stenography or opinion, although Christiane Amanpour of CNN can come close, which is why she is rarely on television anymore.

He lasted because he played as hard as he worked, mostly sailing in the Atlantic.

]]>
By: Kryten42 https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47019 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:31:11 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47019 Yeah, all too true sadly. I guess the closest currently might be Olbermann. He does at least admit mistakes and has given public apologies, though he’s really a commentator giving his own opinions than an actual fact-based news reporter (and I can’t think of a mainstream one off the top of my head. Maybe Maddow, but she’s not yet ‘mainstream’ unfortunately.)

Sadly, we have to rely on people like Stewart and Colbert who can only get away with it by wrapping the news up in comedy, like the court jesters of old.

I’m amazed Mr. Cronkite lasted so long truthfully, he must have been very tough, even though he obviously had a huge heart. A very rare combination. ๐Ÿ™‚

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47016 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:07:35 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47016 One of the odd things that no one learned from Cronkite is the way he responded to an error in reporting. People don’t remember the errors, because he didn’t hide them. If a mistake was made, you heard it from him, on the broadcast. If he didn’t trust something he checked himself. These days all of the media try to hide mistakes, which only makes it worse.

It’s hard for people in today’s media environment to understand, but for a lot of the country, it wasn’t true until Cronkite told you “That’s the way it is”. He was trusted, not because he never made a mistake, but because of the way he handled mistakes. He took responsibility for what he reported.

When he turned sour on Southeast Asia, there was no suggestion of attacking him, the way journalists are routinely attacked today, to attempt it would have been political suicide. LBJ was one of the toughest, bare-knuckle politicians to ever become President, but he wouldn’t fight a pronouncement from Walter Cronkite.

It’s hard to believe that there was a time when you could believe what was reported on network news, but there was, and it is sorely missed by those of us who remember that time.

]]>
By: Kryten42 https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47014 Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:15:48 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47014 Very sad, but he had a long life. My mother used to love watching him here in the 80’s (we had replays on pay TV usually late at night.) And I remember watching him several times and being very impressed.

The saddest part is that it’s one more voice of sanity and reason gone.

R.I.P. Sir.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47003 Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:15:16 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47003 Uncle Walter was the news for a major part of my life. I transitioned from Edward R. Morrow to Walter Cronkite to nothing.

]]>
By: Lab Kat https://whynow.dumka.us/2009/07/17/rip-walter-leland-cronkite-1916-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-47000 Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:50:27 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=10141#comment-47000 It’s not “news” anymore… it’s commentary and pandering.

I’m sad, sad, sad at the moment.
.-= ยดs last blog ..And, thatโ€™s the way it was =-.

]]>