Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Do Not Retain This Judge https://whynow.dumka.us/2010/10/25/do-not-retain-this-judge/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:02:47 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2010/10/25/do-not-retain-this-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-53798 Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:02:47 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=17527#comment-53798 In reply to Ame.

That was a very narrow ruling dealing only with the law they were presented with, which was a mistake on the part of the plaintiffs who should have included the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the US Constitution in their appeal. Judges in Florida are all “strict constructionists” and only the Florida Supreme Court can expand on the law by referencing a wider scope of issues.

That said, the judges should have made the effort. There is not much point in a “public meeting” if the public isn’t allowed to participate.

The first district pulled the same garbage with the law suits on imposing property taxes on the leaseholders on the barrier islands. It took a very narrow reading to come to their conclusion.

]]>
By: Ame https://whynow.dumka.us/2010/10/25/do-not-retain-this-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-53797 Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:46:29 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=17527#comment-53797 I’m not likely to vote to retain any of the first district’s appellant judges because of this ruling, [I’ll post a blog link with comment and link to ruling]
http://www.northescambia.com/?p=15270

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2010/10/25/do-not-retain-this-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-53795 Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:40:30 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=17527#comment-53795 In reply to jams o donnell.

The state is stuck with a nearly $50 million dollar mortgage that will approach $100 million in actual cost by the time it is paid off. We will be stuck with a building that has minimal resale value, and cost a mint to upkeep.

We are cutting state jobs across the board and reducing funding for schools while wasting money like this. We could have bought an existing building with more space almost anywhere in the district for a fourth of what this thing cost, if there was actually a demonstrated need for more space.

Conservative government – penny-wise and pound foolish. Complain about the cost of school lunches, but build palaces for the elite.

]]>
By: jams o donnell https://whynow.dumka.us/2010/10/25/do-not-retain-this-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-53794 Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:52:29 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=17527#comment-53794 So what services were cut to fund this abomination Bryan?

]]>