Comments on: We Waited Four Years For This?

By: Bryan

Bryan — Sun, 15 May 2011 02:53:10 +0000

All they had to do was copy the law from another state, and not try to write their own version.

By: Badtux

Badtux — Sat, 14 May 2011 16:32:41 +0000

Indeed, Mr. Ken. How *dare* they interfere with the tourist trade in Mossy Head, where men are men and goats are scared! :twisted: Now Floriduh needs to get a new tourist video, the old one is no longer operative. Sheesh! - Badtux the Snarky Penguin

By: Ken

Ken — Sat, 14 May 2011 13:30:55 +0000

Guess they should have left well enough alone… only pass laws we absolutely need, and maybe they’ll pay enough attention to each one to get it right!

By: Bryan

Bryan — Fri, 13 May 2011 03:15:55 +0000

It would be a lot easier if you use “Homo sapiens” vice “person” and forbid sex outside your species. Of course, that would still be a problem for Republicans and most law enforcement officers.

For some reason I am reminded of the story of the naming of Chicken, Alaska. Originally they were going to call it “Ptarmigan”, which is a common bird in the area, but they couldn’t agree on how to spell it, so they called it “Chicken” as everyone knew how to spell that. It was probably the thought of one of the local deputies trying to spell “Homo sapiens”, or “Bestiality” when it comes to it.

Jams, it depends on how you are “improving” the books and what kind of “tea” [nudge, nudge … wink, wink]

By: jams o donnell

jams o donnell — Thu, 12 May 2011 19:38:26 +0000

No sex Bryan? Well there is tea and improving books!

By: Steve Bates

Steve Bates — Thu, 12 May 2011 14:46:33 +0000

Never mind, Bryan... I posted it at my place.

By: Badtux

Badtux — Thu, 12 May 2011 14:38:55 +0000

Just read the bill again. They refer to a definition of animals as “dumb animals”, and prohibit sex between people and “dumb animals”.

I guess that means the Lege can only have sex with themselves, in a way approved by their veterinarian :twisted:.

– Badtux the got-my-snark-back Penguin

By: Steve Bates

Steve Bates — Thu, 12 May 2011 14:26:42 +0000

I have some great doggerel for you, but your spam filter doesn’t like it… I’ll email it to you, Bryan.

By: Badtux

Badtux — Thu, 12 May 2011 05:49:38 +0000

Oh my … oh my … can’t breath … cats looking at me in distress… oh my.

Well, actually, I followed the link and it’s pretty clear the Lege were using the legal definition of an animal, not the scientific definition that defines man as an animal. “Animal” in legalese does not include people, just critters who *aren’t* Homo Sapiens.

Still, if it had actually outlawed all sex, it would have been effin’ hilarious…

– Badtux the Legalese-parsin’ Penguin