They include a massive number of questions, most of them ignored, to hide what they are really looking at, and to avoid people gaming the system. That only works in the center.
Reality isn’t dependent on personality type, it is. Whether people believe in it has no effect on its existence.
As for the catalogs, whenever you find the time, Kryten.
]]>Estimated Frequencies of the Types in the United States Population
There is a MBTI test here, if anyone wants to take a shot (I have no idea whatsoever about the accuracy of these online tests, but they may serve as an indicator for anyone interested I guess. The questions on this one seem very similar to the ones I was asked, but mine was actually three iterations over three days, to refine the indicators it was explained to me). 🙂
Just for a bit of fun! 😉
]]>Ahhh… I just looked it up! 😀 Actually, that could be interesting. 😉 🙂
A documentary about typography, graphic design, and global visual culture.
Hmmm… Thanks Steve! 😀
And yeah, Helvetica is *HUGE* (the typeface I mean). There are so many variants now! I generally use the Linotype variant called “Neue Helvetica Pro” (available in OpenType, TTF & PS1) but it has over 50 fonts in the family (like bold, black, condensed, expanded, lite, medium and even a roman variation!) When I was in DTP, the most common were: Helvetica, Futura, Garamond, Palatino & Times Roman.
Oh yes! I used TeX or actually LATEX (let’s see how that turns out here!) 😉 It was/is the best way to create and process technical documents (I also used Mathematica for documents with heavy mathematical content, especially graphs & charts). Hmm… I see they are up to v3 now. I’ll have to install it. 😀
LaTeX – A document preparation system
You are correct, Bryan, about my profile being useful for Mil/Int. It was because of that that the *powers that be* decided to offer me the role they did (that and the fact that I’d already had some decent weapons, self-defense & survival training). I essentially jumped well ahead of the queue. It caused a few ruffled feathers, which, as you could tell from my profile, worried me not one iota! 😆
BTW, It’s quite possible that you (Bryan) and Steve have the same or similar personality type, given your history. 🙂 That would be *cool*, as they say! 😉 😀 But to be honest, it makes no difference to me in any case. I do value you both (and others here) for who you are. 🙂 I look at this blog, one of the very few I visit at all now, as a tiny Island of sanity & rationality in a Universe of insanity & chaos! Thanks all, sincerely!
PS. I’ll get those catalogs online for your perusal ASAP. Might take a few days. 🙂
]]>I know it isn’t free, as I have licenses for the sucker as a Postscript typeface and a Truetype, as well as several of the near clones.
Actually I preferred Avant Garde as my go-to sans typeface back when I was doing it, and Futura was the preference of my biggest client.
The typeface was specifically designed not to imply anything – it was literally designed to be boring. I think they succeeded beyond the original specification.
]]>IIRC from the part of the movie during which I was awake, Helvetica is the single most commonly used (and hence most commonly licensed… it isn’t free) typeface in the Western world. The movie was a sort of survey of many of the uses, interwoven with interviews with a number of type designers. The movie was well-made, but no one could have made the subject truly interesting to anyone not involved daily with typefaces.
]]>I know what you mean about have to consciously remember to praise the competent people. Encouraging those who are having problems coming up to speed is drilled into you in supervisor’s training, but the people you depend on to do their jobs without supervision, need some reinforcement. I actually had that scheduled in my planner, because I was really the pits about that, taking it as a given that some of the people on my crew didn’t really need supervision. They did things their own way, and it worked for them and produced what was needed. I concentrated on those that needed some help to get to the same level.
Yep, you are entitled to your opinion, but not your own facts. If you draw different conclusions from the same facts, you may well be right, but if you need to alter the facts to justify your conclusion, you lose.
Steve, that documentary actually has an IMDB entry. Why anyone wanted to create a film about a 50-year-old typeface is beyond my understanding. The typeface is boring, so the film would have to be.
Frankly, I can’t imagine using anything but TEX for anything scientific that involved formulae. The opportunities for errors are just too great, and I saw them first hand in high school and college. It was the last college book that really got to me – $50 for the book and you received hand-drawn corrections to the examples in the book from the instructor on the first day of class.
Apparently the author corrected every proof that was sent to him, but new errors crept in every time it was typeset. In the printed form the errors weren’t obvious until you started plugging in values. Not an ideal learning environment.
TEX was a very important product in the mini/academic arena. I don’t know of anything that is as accurate for its purpose.
]]>Last year I experimented with TEX for a while. A friend asked me to proofread a math paper which he had set in TEX, and that piqued my curiosity even though I have no real need for it. Since the Linux implementation of it is (of course) free, I installed it, along with a suitable front end called TEXmaker. My conclusion: this is worthwhile exactly and only if you are a mathematician intent on self-publishing. My mathematician friend, however, says many publishers will accept his TEX documents, and it avoids a lot of problems in a necessarily error-prone process.
]]>Oooh… That was a loooong comment (Sorry! I just scanned the document, cut out a few personal bits, and pasted it with some of my own comments!) 😆
I never create a site with non-standard fonts, unless I have to and I can *gracefully* show the page on anything from Lynx up! 😀 It’s inconsiderate and foolish IMHO! 😉
]]>Says I am an INTJ Personality Type (Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging, or Introverted Intuition with Extroverted Thinking)! 😆
And I quote: ” You live in the World of ideas and strategic planning. You value intelligence, knowledge, and competence, and typically have high standards in these regards, which you continuously strive to fulfill. To a lesser degree, you have a similar expectation of others.” Yup! I do not suffer fools well… you may have guessed?! 😆
“With introverted Intuition dominating your personality,you focus your energy on observing the world, and generating ideas and possibilities. Your mind constantly gathers information and makes associations about it. You are extremely insightful and are quick to understand new ideas. However, your primary interest is not understanding a concept, but rather applying that concept in a useful way. Unlike the INTP type, you do not follow an idea to extreme conclusion, you seek only to understand it fully. You are driven to come to a conclusion about an idea. Your need for closure and organisation usually requires you to take some action.”
“Your tremendous value and need for systems and organisation, combined with your natural insightfulness, makes your type excellent scientists. As a scientist you give a gift to society by putting your ideas into a useful form for others to follow. It is not easy for you to express your internal images, insights, and abstractions. The internal form of your thoughts and concepts are highly individual and not readily translatable into a form that others will understand. However, you are driven to translate your ideas into a plan or a system that will be readily explainable, rather than trying to create a direct translation of your thoughts. You usually do not see the value of a direct transaction, and also have difficulty expressing your ideas, which are non-linear. However, your extreme respect of knowledge and intelligence motivates you to explain yourself to others that you feel are deserving of the effort required.”
“You are a natural leader, although you usually choose to remain in the background until you see a real need to take over the lead. When in a leadership role, you are quite effective, because you are able to objectively see the reality of a situation, and are adaptable enough to change things which are not working well. You are a supreme strategist – always scanning available ideas and concepts and weighing them against the current strategy, to plan for every conceivable contingency.”
(As another aside, I proved that case whilst in my Mil/Int *career*.)
“Other people may have a difficult time understanding you. They may see you as aloof and reserved. Indeed, you are not overly demonstrative of your feelings, and are likely not to give much praise or support as others may feel they need or they desire. This does not mean that you do not have affection or regard for others, you simply do not typically feel the need to express it. Others may falsely perceive you to be rigid or det in your ways. Nothing could be further from the truth, because you are committed to to always finding the objective best strategy to implement your ideas. You are actually quite open to hearing an alternative way of doing something.”
(Yes. I had to learn to train myself to be more demonstrative and expressive, especially when I became a leader of others. I learned quickly that this helped get the best out of everyone, including myself. I had to learn not to simply assume that the people around me knew how good they were and how much I valued them. And the resulting expressions and improved attitudes of my team mates and co-workers made me feel better, so it was win-win.) 🙂
And this explains why I cannot AT ALL abide your (and our) right-wing lunatics!! Grrrrrr Makes my blood boil.
“Your interest in dealing with the World is to make decisions, express judgements, and put everything that you encounter into an understandable and rational system. Consequently, you are quick to express judgements. You have very evolved intuition (as an aside, my Intuition quotient was 89%), and are usually convinced you are correct about things even without physical proof, and are generally proven correct over time. You are often misunderstood because you often find it very difficult to express you insights and ideas. In these cases, you tend to blame misunderstandings on the limitations of the other party, rather than your own difficulty expressing yourself.”
Hmmm… I guess this is why some people (typically those whose opinions of me I couldn’t care less about) think of me as arrogant and/or elitist. 😈
“Jungian functional preference ordering:
Dominant: Introverted Intuition
Auxiliary: Extroverted Thinking
Tertiary: Introverted Feeling
Inferior: Extroverted Sensing”
“You generally have the following traits:
Able to absorb extremely complex theoretical and complex material.
Driven to create order and structure from theoretical abstractions.
Supreme strategist.
Future-oriented.
See the global “big picture”
Very strong insights and intuitions, which you trust implicitly.
Value your own opinion over others.
Love difficult theoretical challenges.
Bored when dealing with mundane tasks and routine.
Highly value knowledge and efficiency.
Have no patience with inefficiency and confusion.
Have very high standards of performance, which you apply to yourself most strongly.
Calm, collected and analytical, even in crisis.
Extremely logical and rational.
Original and independent.
A natural leader, but you will follow those you can fully support.
Creative, ingenious, innovative, and resourceful.
You work best alone, and you prefer to work alone.”
LOL So… that’s me! 😉 And I haven’t changed much in over thirty years! My Grandfather would be proud! 😉 😀
(And… Thank goodness for Scanners & OCR!) 😆
And no… I do NOT suffer fool’s at all well! But… I do know the difference between someone who is different from me, and someone who is a fool! I have no problem at all with *different* (except maybe trying to explain myself or finding a common point of reference, but these days, I see that as *my* problem to solve. 20+ years ago, I generally couldn’t be bothered. So I have changed in that regard.). 🙂
Maybe this will help you-all understand me a little better and put my past comments into some perspective. 🙂
]]>I learned to program in Postscript from the “Adobe bible”. They are with my DEC manuals, as I first dealt with Postscript on DEC printers before I committed to micros.
Well, looking can’t hurt, but the basic problem is that on the Web you can only effectively use the fonts the visitors have, or they don’t see what you wanted them to see. It is like the early days of Russian on the ‘Net, you have to get the fonts that were being used or you couldn’t read the site, so I have too many Cyrillic fonts in different formats to use the sites I was interested in. The new standards have helped a lot as long as you stay with the MS ‘New” type faces, which makes for some really bland sites, but people can at least read them.
Some of the sites I visit are obviously designed for fonts that I don’t have, as the spacing is very odd, as if the people who created them are looking at fonts that are considerably smaller or larger that the fonts I have. I assume that people are already looking into the problem and it will be solved at some point and fonts on the ‘Net will look like the font explosion that took place when laser printers and high quality inkjets were introduced. I remember with no fondness the inter-office memos in 6 colors and 12 fonts concerning agenda items at department meetings. Snide remarks about looking like invitations to birthday parties for pre-schoolers had no effect. I think we have been successful in suppressing the blinking, but there will always be a new challenge.
]]>