Most of the ‘legal commentariat’ have wondered from the beginning why this case was even pursued. It requires a jury to read the defendant’s mind, and I don’t know how you can expect that. The only way you could prove the case is to have Edwards take the stand and admit it. There was a less than zero chance of that happening, so why go forward?
The case was lost, and the prosecution should have known it, when it went beyond a week of deliberations. If the jury didn’t buy it quickly, they weren’t going to buy it after thinking about it.
]]>Hopefully someone at the Justice Department has enough sense to pull the plug on this now…
– Badtux the Sleaze-aint-illegal Penguin
]]>