Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Guns https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:53:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60085 Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:53:38 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60085 In reply to Badtux.

McVeigh was another John Brown, with dozens more before and after.

I sometimes feel that the NCOs are worried that sooner or later orders won’t be obeyed. There is a lot of resentment over the lower ranks being prosecuted while the officers get off when something goes wrong [like Abu Ghraib]. When you add in the talk over changes in benefits, the grumbling gets louder.

We both know that a lot of the equipment doesn’t work the way it should and the logistics suck. It doesn’t help when the Air Force can roll out a functioning base with air conditioning in a week, while the Army and Marines are stuck in shelter covers for months. Rumsfeld went to war with ‘the Army he had’ and didn’t do much to fix it.

I’m waiting for the time when troops are demand to see written orders before coming to Attention, because they are tired of being scapegoats for officers. I’m not sure how violations of the Posse Comitatus Act will go down, but we were always told not to give orders that you don’t think will be obeyed.

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60082 Sun, 29 Jul 2012 05:43:22 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60082 NCO’s are what makes a unit work. If the NCO’s are unhappy, something needs to be fixed, because unhappy NCO’s are units that aren’t working. Of course, the officers who would need to fix things are the actual problem, so… yeah.

Thing is, the unhappy NCO’s are exactly the sort of people who would have no problem at all receiving orders to “take out” some of these militia dimwits who think stocking up on AK-47’s and ammo will allow them to overthrow a “tyrannical government” (a.k.a. a government which doesn’t allow them to impose their religion upon others at gunpoint). And yes, there are some enlisted who would sympathize with the militia dimwits, but unless things have really gotten bad they’re still going to go along with their NCO’s. And there are still plenty of ambitious officers who are more in love with being perfumed princes than in love with their Bibles, they might grumble about their orders but the last militia dimwit who thought the police and military would join the cause ended up being executed for his crimes. (Timothy McVeigh, recall, believed that his actions would be the signal for the revolution that overthrew what he felt was a tyrannical government… instead it pretty much ended the militia movement for a decade because the government cracked down *hard*).

In other words, cynicism and fatalism rule at the low end of the totem pole, and ambition still outranks the Bible in the officer ranks of the Army. (Probably not in the Air Force, but the Air Force would not be used against militia types anyhow). If the types stockpiling AK-47’s really think this is going to let them overthrow a “tyrannical” government, they will be sadly disabused of that notion if ever attempting to do so.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60076 Sun, 29 Jul 2012 03:52:14 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60076 In reply to Badtux.

You can’t avoid the ‘officer class’ down here, because this is one of the places where they retire. My Dad retired as an officer, but that was because he had a direct commission from World War II and had a medical retirement. I was on the list for E-6 when I got out. That said, I was part of the 4% of the Air Force on flying status, and had an intel specialty, so I was subjected to a lot of officers. The ‘plane drivers’ were OK, but you had to keep the others in line or they would think they knew something. The sad fact is that the intel courses for officers were a pale shadow of the courses for the ‘enlisted trash’.

I talk to the NCOs, and they are really unhappy with the way things are in the military. Religion and politics are forbidden topics under DoD directives and regulations, but the military has really become infected with both. It was creeping in after the military went all volunteer, but it exploded under the Shrubbery. Units aren’t unified, they way they were before, and it makes the NCOs nervous. Of course, the stress of multiple deployments is playing hell with effectiveness.

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60071 Sat, 28 Jul 2012 03:04:21 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60071 I’m afraid I don’t hang out with the officer class, since I’m from the grunt class. It’s well known that the Air Force Academy might as well be called Jesus Academy and some of the officers in other services may be a few Bibles shy of a full load. Thing is, there’s also a lot of ambitious people willing to take their place if they decided to not obey the government and were dismissed by the Presidential administration and the grunt class would gleefully follow the orders of their new officers to arrest their old officers because they have a generalized disdain for the officer class and allegiance to their paycheck that far outweighs any devotion to Fox News. In other words, I’m not seeing that a tyrannical government would have any problem maintaining the allegiance of the armed forces and police forces even with all the Fox News kool-aid drinkers and fundies in their ranks, as long as the paychecks keep coming.

That last of course being the biggy. If the USA turns into the world’s largest failed state, as seems increasingly likely, and the paychecks stop flowing to cops and soldiers… well. All hell breaks loose then. I don’t even want to think about it, because it’ll make Somalia and Afghanistan look like paradise, because neither Somalia nor Afghanistan had modern professional militaries and police forces before they disintegrated. Body count would be high. Really high. Really really high. Ugh.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60061 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:02:52 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60061 That was terrible, Steve 😉

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60059 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 04:40:47 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60059 In reply to Badtux.

Badtux, I see them every day as I am surrounded by the largest Air Force Base in the US, and possibly the world. It is the home of the AF Special Operations Command, a Special Forces brigade, airborne weapons systems testing, F-35 training, the Ranger school, AF/Navy EOD school, etc. With a dozen axillary fields in addition to the main base, and a half million acre national forest, the military is still part of my life.

The fundies have done a good job of infecting the military with their brand of whacko religion, and the Tea Party has a large presence in the county.

Jerry Boykin wasn’t the only off the wall general in the Army, and John Catton wasn’t alone in the Air Force.

I wouldn’t put any serious money on what the military would or won’t do, nor would I bet on the police given the current decreases in their pay and benefits. Things are pretty dicey. Fox News is not exactly unknown at places where the military and cops hang out locally.

]]>
By: Steve Bates https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60056 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 04:27:58 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60056 “Branch Davidian compound”

Referring to the number of “wives” that fellow had, I took to calling it the “Branch Chlamydian” compound…

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60054 Fri, 27 Jul 2012 03:20:35 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60054 I don’t know how many of the younger cops and soldiers that you know, Bryan. On the cop side, I’m seeing three types of cops now — idealists, thugs, and paycheck-gatherers. The thugs will kick butt for the government because that’s how they get their kicks. The paycheck-gatherers will kick butt for the government because that’s how they get their paychecks. The idealists… well, they may be a problem, but they don’t tend to last long as cops nowadays. Meanwhile, on the soldier side, what I see is a lot of disillusioned youngsters who joined the military because the alternative was worse, they’re there for the paycheck. Most of the young soldiers I know are cynical and disillusioned and not really into overthinking the orders they get from their chain of command, simply assuming that said orders will be stupid and brutal and utterly impractical but attempting to do them anyhow is what a soldier does. I’ll just note that after reports of shots fired at rescue workers in New Orleans after Katrina, when the National Guard was sent into New Orleans with loaded weapons and orders to kill anybody who was a threat to public order, there wasn’t a single soldier who refused that order, which basically was ordering them to shoot their fellow Americans.

Frankly, as long as the soldiers and cops are being paid by the government, with the current force composition of the military and police force, I can’t see that the small number of ideologues in their ranks would be able to turn the military or police forces against the government. The deep cynicism of a large majority in those positions pretty much says they’re going to continue working for whoever gives them a paycheck… which, in general, is *not* going to be some right-wing militia losers attempting to overthrow the government at gunpoint.

Which of course is why the right wing is attempting to attack the paychecks of the military and police forces… but that’s another story.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60047 Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:38:21 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60047 The problem in the US is that a major segment of the military and the police would side with the ‘insurgents’ as they are part of the same culture that distrusts government. Things would get very nasty and protracted. I see it resolving itself into another Civil War, not a revolution.

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2012/07/24/guns-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60043 Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:07:42 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=26028#comment-60043 I would say that Iraq and Afghanistan are examples of what happens when the community battles an outside invading military. The goal is to make it too expensive for that military to hang around, not to defeat that military via force of arms. The latter simply isn’t happening, there isn’t a single tactical encounter between U.S. forces and insurgents where the insurgents walked away and the U.S. forces didn’t, with the exception of the roadside bombs and IED’s and even there the death toll is trivial by the standards of even American highways — more Americans die of traffic accidents on any major holiday than die in Afghanistan or Iraq in a typical month even back when both wars were “hot”. The insurgency is a nuisance at best to the Army and Marines — an *expensive* nuisance, but still only a nuisance, militarily. But that’s not what the insurgency is about — it’s about forcing the U.S. military to go home.

But if, in the fertile imaginations of these “patriots”, the U.S. Army was running around the USA with hobnailed boots, that strategy used by the Iraq and Afghan insurgency works about as well as Saddam’s Soviet strategy of “retreat and wait for winter” to match his Soviet weaponry. Uhm, the Army would *already* be home in that case, just as Iraq has no winter :).

Which isn’t to say that there have not been cases where an insurgency , unsupported by foreign powers, overthrew the established government and came to power. The October Revolution is of course a prime example of that happening. But if Kerensky had been supported by an Army that had the discipline, training, and weaponry of the U.S. Army, and a police force with the training, weaponry, and intelligence capabilities of a typical big-city U.S. police force, the Bolsheviks would have been slaughtered. But in the event Kerensky had of course already lost the support of the Russian Army and the Russian Army had never been a particularly well-trained or well-armed force in the first place, as well as most of it being at the Western Front. The same decidedly cannot be said to be true of the U.S. Army… it is well trained, well armed, and if told that a mob of armed revolutionaries is attempting to overthrow the government by force rather than by vote, would have absolutely no problem opening fire on said mob of revolutionaries and slaughtering them.

]]>