Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Good News?
https://whynow.dumka.us/2013/08/24/good-news-14/
On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blogMon, 26 Aug 2013 18:12:38 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3
By: hipparchia
https://whynow.dumka.us/2013/08/24/good-news-14/comment-page-1/#comment-65185
Mon, 26 Aug 2013 18:12:38 +0000http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=30609#comment-65185They might be combining it with a mineral to produce something like limestone or dolomite, which seems to be what they are saying when they talk about ‘rock’
that was my impression too.
]]>
By: Bryan
https://whynow.dumka.us/2013/08/24/good-news-14/comment-page-1/#comment-65179
Sun, 25 Aug 2013 16:40:05 +0000http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=30609#comment-65179They might be combining it with a mineral to produce something like limestone or dolomite, which seems to be what they are saying when they talk about ‘rock’ and the natural process to lock up carbon dioxide. Many of the sedimentary rocks are carbonates.
CO2 in water is a weak acid, so there is a reactive potential, but the cost of the process and its success would then depend on what mineral is involved, and how much energy is expended obtaining it.
]]>
By: Badtux
https://whynow.dumka.us/2013/08/24/good-news-14/comment-page-1/#comment-65177
Sun, 25 Aug 2013 07:40:39 +0000http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=30609#comment-65177The core problem is that it takes as much energy to turn carbon dioxide back into hydrocarbons as was produced by burning the hydrocarbons to begin with. Though perhaps there is a catalyst that will use less energy to simply turn it into carbon and oxygen? Hmm…
]]>