The really amazing thing in this case was how blatant the conduct was despite knowing about the video and the physical evidence. It’s pretty lame when a cop can’t even come up with a credible bogus charge to provide him cover for being arrogant SOB. These cops assumed that no one would really question or investigate their conduct. I assume that no one has actually been investigating charges against the police in Baltimore prior to this incident.
]]>Ms. Mosby appears very confident. I suspect, however, that by the end of this she will be much wiser and much more cynical.
]]>I guess the attorney has to complain about something to draw attention away from the facts in the case which show the cops are guilty.
]]>As for the evidence, the FOP is whining that 2 weeks is too short a time to gather enough evidence for charges. But really, what more evidence do we need? They assaulted a man on the street without probable cause, broke his leg, threw him in a van, and then gave him a “rough ride” that killed him. The medical examiner’s office has verified that it was the “rough ride” that killed him, the video footage shows that it was the cops who grabbed him and dragged him into the van, this is the prosecution equivalent of a man shooting another man in a bar in front of a dozen witnesses.
]]>She charged what the evidence showed, what she can prove, and that is as good as it gets.
]]>But in the end it all depends on the judge she gets. Some of the judges in Maryland are so reflexively pro-police that even if the jury finds the officer guilty, they’ll overturn the verdict on a technicality, like that judge did in Prince Georges County when two of their cops assaulted an affluent (black) college student and one of them got convicted by the jury. Ms. Mosby isn’t prosecuting six cops, in the end. She’s prosecuting an entire system of abuse that has corrupted even the courts in Baltimore, and that system is not going to take that lightly.
]]>