Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Unintended Consequences
https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/01/25/unintended-consequences-8/
On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blogThu, 28 Jan 2016 02:41:47 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3
By: Bryan
https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/01/25/unintended-consequences-8/comment-page-1/#comment-81018
Thu, 28 Jan 2016 02:41:47 +0000http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=36432#comment-81018When I went to California from New York in 1983, I showed them my NY license [no photo] and told them my address. I have had a Florida driver’s license since 1991, but when I renew it I will need my old license, my birth certificate, a utility bill, my Social Security card, and a partridge in a pear tree. It is absurd.
]]>
By: Badtux
https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/01/25/unintended-consequences-8/comment-page-1/#comment-81011
Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:25:28 +0000http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=36432#comment-81011Oh wow! And yeah, I know about getting a driver’s license. I had to show up with a utility bill, my Social Security card, and my birth certificate, *in addition* to my Arizona driver’s license, when I moved to California after they passed these laws. Crazy. Always before, I just had to show up with my old license and a utility bill showing my current address to get my new license when I moved to a new state.
]]>
By: Bryan
https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/01/25/unintended-consequences-8/comment-page-1/#comment-81006
Wed, 27 Jan 2016 03:22:35 +0000http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=36432#comment-81006Apparently they used forged California drivers licenses to gain access to Planned Parenthood, and the laws concerning ID have been toughened up by the ‘Real ID Law’ as part of the War on Terror™. Getting a drivers license is a real PITA now.
]]>
By: Badtux
https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/01/25/unintended-consequences-8/comment-page-1/#comment-81001
Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:28:26 +0000http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=36432#comment-81001“Tampering with government documents”. I wonder. Could it be that when the grand jury subpoenaed the original video source from these guys, they edited the videos they turned over in response to the subpoena in order to remove embarrassing things? Usually that’s contempt, not “tampering with government documents”, but I don’t know how Texas law works.
]]>