Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: The Florida Amendment 1 Con https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/10/27/the-florida-amendment-1-con/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:33:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/10/27/the-florida-amendment-1-con/comment-page-1/#comment-83185 Mon, 31 Oct 2016 01:33:58 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=38121#comment-83185 The Koch brothers and Exxon have donated money to get Amendment 1 passed in Florida.

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/10/27/the-florida-amendment-1-con/comment-page-1/#comment-83183 Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:10:03 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=38121#comment-83183 When you don’t know which way to vote, seeing who’s for it and who’s against it is always a reliable way to choose. We had a ballot proposition here in California to tie Medicaid drug prices to the VA negotiated drug prices. I wasn’t sure that was a good idea, until Big Pharma jumped in with a $40M campaign to defeat it. At which time, “If Big Pharma is agin’ it, I’m for it” became my motto.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/10/27/the-florida-amendment-1-con/comment-page-1/#comment-83182 Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:48:36 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=38121#comment-83182 The whole thing made no sense as a constitutional amendment, and less sense after reading it. After I read them I check the suspicious ones to see who is paying for what, i.e. who is supporting and who is opposing.

]]>
By: Mustang Bobby https://whynow.dumka.us/2016/10/27/the-florida-amendment-1-con/comment-page-1/#comment-83179 Sun, 30 Oct 2016 09:46:44 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=38121#comment-83179 Voted against it. The slick ads were the tip-off that it was being promoted by those with deep pockets, and further investigation proved it so.

]]>