Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/public/wp-config.php:27) in /home/public/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: It’s A Con https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/ On-line Opinion Magazine...OK, it's a blog Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:25:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87800 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 15:25:31 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87800 They are apparently getting the tents from a contractor who worked/works for the Emergency Management Agency. These guys normally work setting up temporary shelters after hurricanes. The equipment all looks to be new and they are outrageously expensive to heat and cool according to the guys in Red Horse [Air Force combat engineers]. It is also hard to sleep with the equipment droning away. It is probably Mil Spec off the same contract used for Iraq, etc. but not from current inventory because “private companies are cheaper and more efficient that the government”.

Military bases are almost always super fund sites. The fuel used for many of the early missiles my Dad worked on could kill you a half dozed different ways. They had huge showers all over the launch sites to wash it off people if there was a leak or spill.

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87797 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 06:34:44 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87797 Oh yeah, the facility in Concord is full of toxic waste. No, I’m not joking. The city has been talking about asking Congress to sell it to them for years in order to build much-needed housing, but every time they go out there to do the required environmental survey, the cost of cleaning it up just goes higher. So they’re going to put a bunch of families / kids in tents in the middle of a bunch of toxic waste. What could go wrong?

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87796 Tue, 26 Jun 2018 06:29:56 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87796 After looking at the photos of those tents, they’re going to be horrifically expensive to heat and cool. They have portable HVAC units set up next to them to do that. These appear to be the kind of tents that the military uses for temporary forward bases, I wonder how many of these that the military has, or are they going to be buying more of them? Whose budget is the purchase coming out of? Whose budget is the expense of heating and cooling these things coming out of?

Apparently the tent city near San Antonio is already nearly full, thus why they’re rushing to open more of them. Just in time for Trump to announce a “suspension” of the zero tolerance policy because they couldn’t figure out how to keep kids and parents together if they had to go through the court system. Like, duh?

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87791 Sun, 24 Jun 2018 22:03:29 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87791 I have plausible deniability, Kryten, so it’s OK as far as I’m concerned.

After the performance of the Secretary of Homeland Security at her press conference I don’t think we should beieve anything they say. Without unannounced inspections and audits of their records I trust them less than Iran. DHS is more in the category of North Korea. ๐Ÿ˜ˆ The MSM keep reporting on the numbers announced up to June 9th. Some of the hardest working reporters are guessing over 3K and maybe 4K is more realistic. When you are moving kids in the middle of the night, you aren’t building trust. They’re kids, not vampires.

There are reasons the military isn’t using those areas:

Building a tent city in a low-lying coastal zone like Orange Beach, Alabama during hurricane season is not a fabulous idea.

Where is the drinking water coming from for 10s of thousands new people in Yuma, Arizona?

They have really created a a fire suppression plan to protect a tent city built at Camp Pendleton, to deal with brush fires caused by live fire at the training ranges?

The area outside of San Francisco looks good, if they have done a thorough EOD sweep of the former weapons text facility. Tents are less of a threat to people if there’s an earthquake.

I think they should hold off and just buy up a farm that went under from the trade war with China.

The White House and EPA should read a newspaper occasionally. The reality of groundwater pollution is in multiple courts. Blocking a report sure looks like obstruction to me. Maybe Michael Avenatti would like to take it on ๐Ÿ‘ฟ

]]>
By: Kryten42 https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87785 Sun, 24 Jun 2018 10:48:56 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87785 ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคจ]]> Yeah.

The 3 new Navy facilities mentioned are supposed to support up to 119,000 people. I’m guessing most of those will be American’s that aren’t white… *sigh*

Think I’ll go play some Diablo 3 RoS. I created a new Seasonal character (Season 14 is on) called Roasroar (from the Spellsinger book series). ๐Ÿ˜‰ ๐Ÿ˜€ About 3/4 way through the season tasks.

Oh! Have you seen this one, it’s just about Pruitt doing what he does best… Killing American Citizens & covering it up.
Report: White House, EPA Blocked Study on Military Water-Contamination Crisis to Avoid โ€˜PR Nightmareโ€™

“The impact to the EPA and Defense Dept is going to be extremely painful. We (DoD and EPA) cannot seem to get ATSDR to realize the potential public relations nightmare this is going to be.”

Yep. Worried about a PR nightmare. Oh, the horror.๐Ÿ˜’๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคจ

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87783 Sun, 24 Jun 2018 09:55:10 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87783 Regarding that fact sheet, note that “criminal alien” has a specific meaning in immigration law. It means that the alien has been convicted of one of a list of felonies that are grounds for immediate removal from US soil. It does not apply to the vast majority of those apprehended at the border.

It looks like a lot of hand waving to me. The numbers don’t match up, for one thing. 500 children reunited when they’ve ripped at least 3500 children away from their parents since this policy started ramping up in May? And they’re building tent cities to hold at least 20,000 children? Talk about your cons.

]]>
By: Kryten42 https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87782 Sun, 24 Jun 2018 05:04:06 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87782 Been running a bunch of threads on Twitter & sharing your comments (badtux knows, I hope that’s OK with you Bryan?) A couple new items have come to light:

Exclusive: Navy Document Shows Plan to Erect ‘Austere’ Detention Camps

DHS has realeased this:

Fact Sheet: Zero-Tolerance Prosecution and Family Reunification

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87778 Sun, 24 Jun 2018 02:45:00 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87778 In reply to Badtux.

In New York this is classed as a B Misdemeanor {<= 6 months in jail and/or <= $500 fine] which results in an appearance ticket from a supervisor for a court date. You don't book them into jail because it is too expensive. It is already expensive to fill out the arrest report and the criminal information [the minimum required paperwork] which is why you had better have a good reason for doing anything other than a "stern lecture". That's why these charges weren't being made before DoJ/JB [Ernie Keebler] Sessions instituted the "zero tolerance" policy.

If they fail to appear there will be an arrest warrant issued and the maximum penalty if convicted. Pre-trial confinement for a first offense B Misdemeanor was unheard of during my time in law enforcement.

]]>
By: Badtux https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87776 Sat, 23 Jun 2018 05:29:20 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87776 Yes, that was my point, Brian, when I said I don’t know how you can keep families together and still have zero tolerance because it’s illegal to put kids in jail for the crimes of their parents. The parents are being kept in pre-trial detention at the local jail for anywhere from 24 to 72 hours before appearing for an initial hearing where they can either plead guilty or ask for a trial. They’re told by the public defender and magistrate judge at the initial hearing that if they plead guilty to misdemeanor illegal entry, they’ll be released back to ICE custody for time served and be able to continue on with their asylum request. Most of them take that deal. Misdemeanor illegal entry does *not*, after all, affect the asylum request. Felony illegal entry would, but that requires a prior conviction for misdemeanor illegal entry.

In short, the magistrate courts at the border are processing these cases lickity split without a trial for the most part, because they’re annoyed they’re even being forced to process all these people. I’ve read several anonymous blog posts from public defenders at the border and they simply don’t have the capacity to handle all these cases if people demanded to go to trial, and the judges don’t want these people clogging up the local jails while waiting for trial either. Thus the little conspiracy between the public defenders and the magistrate judges to just get these people the f**k out of the system for “time served” and back into ICE custody ASAP with as little time and effort as possible.

All of which is utterly incompatible with keeping parents and children together, which is why I think Hair Twitler is funning us when he says he’ll both keep them together, and continue with the zero tolerance policy. The two just can’t happen simultaneously. Not without a lot of cooperation between multiple incompatible bureaucracies — CBP, ICE, the local jails, the local magistrate judges, HHS Child Protection Services, the Federal prosecutor’s office, the U.S. Marshall’s Service… you’d have to make this whole machine mesh like one machine, instead of the cranky bucket of parts they usually operate as. I don’t see how. Heck, the paperwork alone takes 24 hours or more to scribble and move between all these pieces and parts.

Cocaine is a hella drug. Just sayin’.

]]>
By: Bryan https://whynow.dumka.us/2018/06/20/its-a-con-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87775 Sat, 23 Jun 2018 03:12:59 +0000 http://whynow.dumka.us/?p=41438#comment-87775 Badtux, they go to DHS detention centers after their hearing before the Federal magistrate, but are in jails or local prisons before hand. The pictures of the hearings show the defendants in the orange prison jumpsuits. DHS uses olive drab jumpsuits with “Detainee” on the back. I have no idea how long they are in pre-trial detention given the lack of prosecutors, court rooms, magistrates, and public defenders. As you and I have said multiple times you don’t charge these people with crimes because it is too damn expensive, and they get real trials with attorneys, not administrative hearings before an immigration judge.

You have to be admitted to the Federal bar to appear in a Federal court. Relatively few JAGs bother with the time and expense. The 179 days is, was, and always will be a con to prevent payments for a PCS [permanent change of station]. That allows the military to deploy you for 179 days, bring you back to your base for a visit and the send you back for another 179 days.

DHS is spending other Departments’ money. Where is the money for all of these new facilities coming from? I would suggest that it come from any funds allocated to Trump’s wall.

]]>