Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27
End Game — Why Now?
On-line Opinion Magazine…OK, it's a blog
Random header image... Refresh for more!

End Game

I just want Mr. Mubarak to know that there are a number of very desirable properties available for reasonable prices in my area, and that the local Republican politicians have no problem with deposed dictators living in the area.

The Egyptian military has made an announcement that they would not use force against the demonstrators and that the demonstrators have “legitimate” complaints.

The new Vice President, Omar Suleiman, announced that he will be meeting with opposition groups to negotiate an ending to the current situation.

There are three, identifiable major players among the opposition groups:

The April 6 Youth Movement are the people that started the protests. They are a loose association of Internet savvy young Egyptians who are concerned with economic conditions and democracy. Politically, they can’t be placed because they aren’t politically inclined, i.e. they aren’t espousing any particular political ideology, they just want everyone to have the right to support their own politics without getting arrested and/or beaten up. More than anything they want decent jobs.

The Muslim Brotherhood is the oldest opposition group in Egypt, and they are banned. They are definitely Islamists, Pan-Islamists actually, but they back non-violence. Many groups that are identified with the MB actually left because of the prohibition against violence. The MB are convinced that they are right, and will win in the end because they are right, so there is no need for violence. “There is no reason to steal what you will be given”. as someone once said to me.

Mohamed ElBaradei is new to the Egyptian political scene, but is well known to the world. He came out early in support of the protests, and while he lacks any deep political support among Egyptians, he would be very important to establishing the global credibility of any new government. He has Islamic credibility for telling the Hedgemony to stuff it on multiple occasions over Iran’s nuclear program. He would make a good “head of state”, as opposed to a prime minister in a parliamentary system.

We will have to wait to see what happens when Mubarak leaves, because it is certain that he is leaving now that the military has sided with the protestors.

4 comments

1 Badtux { 01.31.11 at 7:32 pm }

There’s speculation that Suleiman is working with the military to ease Mubarak out with an eye to taking Mubarak’s place himself. One thing to remember is that Suleiman is a genuine evil SOB. He ran (runs?) Egypt’s torture chambers. So that’s a *fourth* power nexus in all of this. But it all depends on whether he can talk down the revolution by throwing Mubarak to them and promising reforms ASAP. Once he has the revolution talked down, he can then revert to his old ways of doing things, just like when his boss was Mubarak.

As for Mohamed ElBaradei, remember some guy named Abulhassan Banisadr? Named to a top government position in order to give his country’s new revolutionary government international credibility while the Islamist hardliners consolidated power behind the scenes? ElBaradei is a disposable figurehead for whoever ends up consolidating power after Mubarak flees. Let us hope for his sake that he is aware of this, rather than trying to do a Banisadr and end up having to flee for his life himself (or worse).

2 Bryan { 01.31.11 at 9:41 pm }

Suleiman is a General in the Egyptian Army, the new prime minister, Ahmad Shafiq, is a General in the Egyptian Air Force, they are serving the interests of the military at this point, and it is in the interest of the Egyptian military to avoid political involvement in case anything unpleasant occurs. I’m sure that, if asked, General Suleiman would view it as his duty to assist the new head of state, but not out front where the blame will be found.

ElBaradei has no real political base in Egypt. He has spent most of his life outside of the country, so he hasn’t built a following. He also hasn’t made any enemies, which makes him useful. He is a perfect choice for waving to the multitudes and cutting ribbons, and all of the other important things that the Queen does.

He has the skill set to be a good Foreign Minister or Judge, but he just doesn’t have the political strength to be anything but a figure head.

There are a number of people with prison time on their CVs and political operations that are more likely to rise to power, and aren’t tainted by association with Mubarak and the NDP [the New Democratic Party of Egypt, not associated with the Canadian version].

I think we can prepare for new fires at NDP offices throughout Egypt as people prepare to deny that they were ever members. Kind of like all those Nazi Party lapel pins that clogged sewers in Germany in 1945.

The Muslim Brotherhood should be able to muster a reasonable showing, but I don’t think the Egyptians are ready for a theocracy. Like everywhere else, it’s jobs that are uppermost on people’s minds.

3 Badtux { 01.31.11 at 11:20 pm }

All I have to say is that I think you’re an optimist here. Egypt isn’t Tunisia, and while I’m sure Suleiman is going for plausible deniability all the way, my gut feel is that some nasty character is going to end up coming out on top here. For one thing, the U.S. doesn’t give billions of dollars in financial aid to nice guys. Doesn’t work that way. Quick — name one regime that gets billions of dollars of financial aid from the U.S. that is ruled by nice guys?

– Badtux the Pessimistic Penguin

4 Bryan { 02.01.11 at 12:27 am }

The Egyptian military as already decided that it wants clean hands. Suleiman will be lurking in the background. but he can’t take power without the support of the military, and Suleiman has been Mubarak’s man for too long.

He may come back later, but the military is concerned about its power, not the power of any individual in the military. They have to worry about a possible push from junior officers, as well as the people in street. The leaders of military organizations are conservative. When they have to accept change, they don’t want it in large doses. They lead a conscript force and that makes a big difference.

There is a reason Mubarak has always relied on his Interior Ministry and the police, because the military maintained its separation from the political.

There are no certainties in this process.