Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27
Vulture vs Venture Capitalists — Why Now?
On-line Opinion Magazine…OK, it's a blog
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Vulture vs Venture Capitalists

I’ve seen a number of people trying to lessen the impact of what private equity firms, like Bain Capital, do to the economy by classing them in with venture capitalist, and calling the results of their raids with the job losses as ‘creative destruction’. The two are just about polar opposites.

If you work in the tech industry you probably don’t like venture capitalists, but realistically they are essential to getting new ideas to market. If they are evil, they are a necessary evil.

By the time you have worked on a project and got it in shape for a real launch, you are normally out of money, and so is everyone you know who might lend you some. The last step is expensive, and the banks won’t go near you. This is when you turn to a venture capitalist to get the final money to finish your ‘dream’.

The important thing to remember is that venture capitalists, are real capitalists, i.e. they are going to risk ‘their money’ in hopes of turning a profit, and they need you to succeed to get their money back. It is a high risk/high reward environment, but it is based on a voluntary agreement between the company and venture capitalist. If the project is successful everyone makes money, and if it is a failure everyone loses.

If the new product is a significant improvement over existing products, the companies that make those products may be devastated, and that is the process called ‘creative destruction’. A recent example would be what has happened to the market for cathode ray tubes after flat LED screens dropped in price.

This is not what corporate raiders, like Bain Capital do. They don’t risk their capital, and they don’t share in any losses as a result of their take-overs. They use leveraged hostile take-overs to seize stable older companies who have low or no debt loads and have been making consistent profits for extended periods. The targets are not growing, they are simply maintaining a nice comfortable pace without any major swings in stock price or other indicators beloved by Wall Street analysts. These are companies that are designed to provide stability and a future, not instant returns. They look out for decades, not quarters.

The vulture capitalists seize control with borrowed money, and once in control loot the victim, and then mortgage it to the hilt. Their small investment is recovered almost instantly, with obscene interest, and they squeeze every possible dime out, before leaving the dessicated hulk to face bankruptcy on its own.

The destruction that occurs isn’t ‘creative’, it is simply destruction.

3 comments

1 jams o donnell { 01.17.12 at 7:15 am }

One of the last acts of the Labour Government was a ban on Vulture Funds seeking redress through our courts. To their credit the Con/Dems ratified the ban. Vulture Funds are the lowest of the low, I daresay even paedophiles look down on the scumbags

2 Steve Bates { 01.17.12 at 10:18 am }

“I daresay even paedophiles look down on the scumbags” – jams

Well, we know for certain that even Romney’s dog looked down on him…

3 Bryan { 01.17.12 at 10:28 pm }

As a true capitalist, I get really pissed off with the looters claiming an association with capitalism in what they do. They have more in common with the Golden Horde than capitalists.

When someone’s dog gets diarrhea when they are in a closed space with the owner, you know the owner has a serious problem. The pound should have put Mitt down and let the dog go after that episode. Cruelty to animals is a serious personality flaw.