Posts from — September 2013
The Middle East
For an overall understanding of why the Middle East is a mess, and will continue to be one, take a look at the maps of religion and ethnicity that have been created and maintained by Dr. Michael Izady on a Columbia University site.
After the fall of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, the Europeans drew lines on maps and created countries that suited them, with no regard for who was living there. These artificial constructs are guaranteed to cause problems because they almost require a dictator to maintain the fiction of a single nation.
Look at Syria. The coast along the Mediterranean is ethnically mixed, but the eastern three-quarters of the country is solidly Sunni Arab. If the various groups had been given their own countries, many of the conflicts would never have occurred.
Into that volatile environment there is currently a new stress: drought.
Digby excerpts a relevant portion of a much longer essay on the current situation that points to water, not oil, is the most important fluid in the Middle East, and things are going to get worse until the rains return.
We shouldn’t be sending missiles to blow up Syria, we should be sending food and drought assistance. That won’t happen, because as Martin Luther King Jr. noted: “We have guided missiles and misguided men.”
September 2, 2013 4 Comments
Labor Day
In any celebration of Labor Day I’m at a slight disadvantage because for a big chunk of my life it was celebrated as May Day where I was living.
It is rather unique, as it is the only holiday I’m aware of that was imported from Canada where it’s spelled Labour Day.
When I was an elementary school student, it marked the end of summer and beginning of school, but it is a rare holiday in the South as there is no tradition of blowing things up in celebration. There is also no tradition of honoring labor in the South, and labor unions are considered communist conspiracies.
Things were different in New York, as it was considered respectable to belong to a union and at various times I belonged to two, and was actually elected treasurer of my AFSCME local.
The largest benefit of belonging to a union is dealing with the employers. The union acts as a buffer and keeps disputes from becoming personal. There is a known and accepted procedure for settling disputes that improves the atmosphere in the workplace because people have to follow the “rules” whether they are managers or workers.
Somewhere along the way people have forgotten that the best way of getting people to work hard for a business is to allow them to benefit from the success of the business. There was a time when corporations and workers were loyal to each other. The workers benefited from increased profits, so they had a reason to work as efficiently as possible. Now, only top managers and investors derive any benefit from success, so workers aren’t “investing” in their employers. Everyone loses.
A point that should be stressed on Labor Day is that if you look at the long list of disastrous business failures the one thing that becomes clear is that they were caused by management – the group that suffered the least. If a few senior managers go to prison, they at least get fed and have a place to sleep, something that is not always true for the workers.
September 2, 2013 9 Comments
A Bit Of Reality
Hitting another country with explosives is an act of war, and universally recognized as such. You can dance around it all you want, but it is an act of war. No one waited to see if the Japanese would have some other explanation for bombing Pearl Harbor, the government of the United States at that time understood that it was an act of war.
Syria has not signed any of the protocols or treaties regarding chemical weapons, so they can’t be in violation. They are in violation of the charter of the International Criminal Court, and the leaders can be charged with war crimes for using chemical weapons. The US can’t refer the Syrians to the International Criminal Court, because the US has not signed the treaty, but Britain could make the referral.
No one has ever been attacked by an outside party based on their use of chemical weapons. Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons against Iranian forces in the Iran-Iraq War, and against his own people, but no one in the international community did anything about it.
What Zero wants to do is unprecedented, and suggesting that the President of the United States can just attack anyone for any reason, is not likely to do good things for the nation’s credibility or standing in the world.
September 1, 2013 4 Comments