Here And There
Vladimir Putin doesn’t think that Ukraine should over-react to the seizure of government buildings in the eastern Ukraine. We all know of the peaceful policies of the Russian government in similar situations, and the number of troops sent in to restore order. There is going to be battle given by the Ukrainians this time.
The Australians have decided that the batteries on the data recorders of the Malaysian airliner have run down and are going to deploy the autonomous submersible to continue the search.
Ita has returned to the ocean, but the rains continue as power crews work to restore power in Queensland. As with Yasi the banana farms suffered severe damage.
10 comments
Interesting how you kept a straight face and avoided putting quote marks around “peaceful policies” :).
If you have read as much Soviet agitprop as I have, it isn’t at all difficult to do. When I was bored awaiting the return of a mission, I would write up all of the memos in the operations area as if they were printed in Pravda. As I did it in Russian, it was a while before I was told to stop it.
LOL Yep. 😉 Same here Bryan! 🙂 I did grin as I read that. 😉 😀
The problem with finding the airliner now is that the ocean bed there is a thick layer of loose silt. Depending on whether the airliner broke up and how much, will have a big impact on finding anything. Given that there is no surface wreckage so far, it’s not very likely unless they get very lucky. If it’s mostly intact, it’s likely sunk beneath the silt.
Ita destroyed sugarcane plantations also. They are estimating the damage bill to be up to AU$1 billion. Latest from Qld:
Cyclone Ita damage bill up to $1 billion after sugarcane and banana plantations damaged
OT: I just came across something interesting, and from a rather unexpected source! 😀 We were discussing solar power last year sometime, and it’s something I have a keen interest about, so I keep an eye on the research & development. 🙂
IBM Solar Collector Magnifies Sun By 2000X – These Could Provide Power To The Entire Planet
Of course, as soon as you read things like “power the whole planet”, you KNOW it’ll never happen in our lifetime, if ever! *shrug*
A side benefit of the IBM system, is that it also produces drinkable water! 🙂
Right. I won’t be holding my breath for this change to happen though. *SIGH* What a good idea, for a change.
They need some different types of probes, and some mapping sonars to find the remains in silt. High efficiency metal detectors should be able to find the engines, and they can spread out from there to find the data recorders. I never believed that the claim about locating the aircraft in days was credible.
I hope they can prove this concept, because drinking water is going to be even more valuable than energy in the future because of climate change. I can see the concept and it looks reasonable, but it has to scale or it will be worthless. It is nice that people are still trying.
* Searching for the aircraft
I had a discussion some years ago with colleagues who identified the technical reasons why Bob Ballard has been so skilled at finding shipwrecks. It is many factors, including:
1) Careful modeling of the most likely area of the surface at which the ship sank
2) Careful modeling of how the body of the ship descends to the bottom, including lateral motions away from the point it sank
3) Once he had a good idea where he should look, he checked out the local sedimentation rates to decide if he was likely to find the debris
4) Recognizing that a sinking ship leaves a long debris trail (miles long) as it sinks and is displaced laterally. So, he often used a camera as the prime sensor and looked for man-made junk on the seabed rather than using a sonar to find the hull
Now, planes are smaller than ships, so there may not be as much of a debris trail.
Autonomous underwater vehicles (like the Bluefin 21 used for this search) have limited energy and lights chew up the batter pack very quickly.
So, they will probably run with a side-scan or synthetic aperture sonar and hope to find some large chunks of airplane with those sonars.
If the fuselage were intact but buried, sub-bottom profilers (sonars that map into the muck) have been put on these vehicles and could find a buried aircraft, but you would really need to have a small search area!
Best
Jim
Another thing Ballard does is use sensors tethered to his ship, which speeds up the process and eliminates the battery problems. With the bottom two miles below you, and the possibility of one or more thermal layers, the senors need to be down near bottom in crush proof casings.
The reason I mentioned the engines is because they will usually drop as a single chunk of metal which is a much better target than whatever is left of the fuselage. Depending on the angle of entry into the water, the wings and tail should separate frome the body of the aircraft. The contents of the luggage compartments should also trail out during the descent to the bottom. I assume they are looking for pieces, not an aircraft. after the engines the data recorders are possibly the largest parts still intact.
Even if they locate the debris, there is no guarantee that they can retrieve anything from that depth. There are tools but they may not be available.
It is going to be interesting to see what happens over the next couple weeks. If there is anything to find where they are looking, it won’t be at all easy.
Here’s something from the “What WAS he thinking??” department, regarding Snowden & Putin in a TV interview. Snowden has proved himself to be a smart guy, so I have to wonder (as the author of this article does), what he’s up to…
Snowden Asks Putin Live On TV If Russia Carries Out Mass Surveillance; But Why?
Hmmmmm… “curiouser and curiouser said Alice”. 😉
I hope things are going easier for you m8, and you have been able to establish a manageable routine. 🙂 Best wishes, as always! 🙂
The search is entering the low information mode with a lot of data collection and analysis.
Snowden might want to leave and thinks the question will encourage Putin to help him move on. It also demonstrates that he isn’t working for the Russian government, which will annoy a number of his critics in the US. There may be a long sea voyage in his future, as I don’t see him trusting air travel.
Given that the U.S. has even intercepted a diplomatic jet in their hilarious search for Snowden, I think the only plane that Snowden would be willing to step upon would be a Tu-95 taking the long way ’round (i.e. over international waters) to Cuba and from thence to his final destination wherever that be. In that case he might want to be careful what he wishes for, the Tu-95 isn’t exactly a luxury ride :).
Or the Russians might take him on a boat ride. If he embarasses them too much, he might just get accidentally “swept overboard” and, unfortunately, lost at sea.
I would guess a sea voyage on a cargo ship from Vladivostok to Ecuador as his most probable exit. His arrival is not Vlad’s problem.