Warning: Constant ABSPATH already defined in /home/public/wp-config.php on line 27
2005 May 03 — Why Now?
On-line Opinion Magazine…OK, it's a blog
Random header image... Refresh for more!

A Taxing Question


In response to several people giving their opinion of the annual income it takes to define the “Middle Class”, Kevin Hayden at The American Street posted the median income of a family of four in the US by state. The median income of a family of four in the country as a whole is $65,093.00. The Department of Health and Human Services uses $18,850.00 as the poverty threshold for a family of four.

As I still haven’t filed the instructions for my 2004 taxes, I decided to calculate the income taxes for a family of four making the median income using the standard deductions. The standard deduction [$9,700] plus the four personal deductions [$3,100/person] yields a $22,100 reduction in taxable income, bringing it down to $42,993 which has a income tax liability of $5,731 [from the table]. Now this family still had to pay at least at 6.2% tax bill for Social Security, but I’m interested in the income tax side.

The actual income tax rate on this median income family is 8.8%

The reason I’m limiting my interest to income tax is because of a post by Steve Bates at the Yellow Doggerel Democrat on yet another “flat tax” proposal. This one involves a 30% value-added-tax, which is essentially a sales tax.

If you buy a car that was priced at $20,000 in Florida you would pay $1,200 in state sales taxes. If the VAT is used that $20,000 car is now $26,000 and you would pay $1,560 in state sales taxes. The way the VAT and state sales taxes are calculated you will be paying taxes on taxes.

What this leads to is the reality that the median income family experiences a tax increase if they spend $20,000 of their $65,093 annual income on taxed items. Under the current system a family of four has to make more than the $22,100 standard deductions before they pay any Federal income tax, but under a VAT they would be paying a 30% tax on everything they buy.

The people proposing the plan keep talking about simplicity, but they start talking about exemptions and other gimmicks when the reality is pointed out. In the end Congress would be playing with exemptions before the ink had dried on the bill, and the savings they talk about achiving from eliminating the IRS would be the result of pushing the government’s tax collecting process down to businesses.

If Congress wanted to simplify the tax code all they would have to do is eliminate all deductions other than the standard deduction and the individual deduction. The whole tax form would look like the 1040EZ. They don’t want to do that because they gain power by having people pay them to include special deductions.


May 3, 2005   Comments Off on A Taxing Question

Good News in Florida


In spite of voting for Republicans, 71% of Florida voters backed a Constitutional amendment that raised the minimum wage to $6.15/hour, effective yesterday, and tied the minimum wage to the cost of living. The cognitive dissonance of being able to understand that the minimum wage needed to be raised, but then voting for people who have consistently refused to raise it, is beyond me.


The BBC notes that the Florida legal system is still functioning:

“Legally speaking, it’s not a difficult decision to make. Morally speaking, it’s very difficult,” the judge said.

“But I’m not here to make the moral decision. I’m here to make the legal decisions,” Judge Ronald Alvarez said, according to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel newspaper.

The 13-year-old was given permission by the court to do what she thought best.

The conclusion should not have surprised anyone who is familiar with the information in the final paragraph of this Newsweek article:

The abortion fight may obscure what many observers consider a far more pressing concern: DCF [Department of Children and Families] incompetence. The scandal-plagued agency made national news in 2002 when it acknowledged that it had lost track of Rilya Wilson, a 5-year-old under its custody. It still can’t account for over 500 kids whom it’s responsible for, according to The Miami Herald. At the Thursday hearing, Judge Alvarez directed his outrage at DCF for never alerting the court to L.G.’s flight from her group home. “To say that I am angry at that would be an understatement,” Alvarez said, questioning why DCF rushed to prevent an abortion but not to find a missing child (DCF counters that it alerted authorities in Pinellas County, where L.G.’s group home was). “I don’t know where our priorities in life are,” Alvarez said. “The priorities should have been to make certain that an order to take [L.G.] into custody was issued as soon as possible … But nobody cared.”

Elected Florida judges still follow the law, not the winds of politics. The Department of Children and Families was given a strong dose of fundamentalism when John Ellis hired Jerry Reiger, founder and former president of the Family Research Council, another child beater in the Dobson mold. Being a “Good Christian”, Reiger resigned over “the appearance of financial improprieties” of the type that put the former Republican governor of Connecticut in jail. The judge acts according to the law, the DCF acts according to the politics.


May 3, 2005   Comments Off on Good News in Florida