The Christian Science Monitor noticed that the US does not consider Taliban terrorists.
The Raging Grannies are under surveillance, but the group blowing up the US and NATO military in Afghanistan aren’t terrorists? People who key SUVs are terrorists, but the group that sheltered Osama bin Laden isn’t?
It has been a busy day, and I’m not ready for this level of cognitive dissonance.
On-line Opinion Magazine featuring annoyed rumblings from the leading edge of the Baby Boom firmly tied to a reality-based world.
Established: 21 November 2004
The opinions expressed in Comments are those of the individuals making them. Truly absurd comments and opinions are subject to being cruelly mocked, but "flame wars" will take place on someone else's dime.
Your first comment, all comments with extensive links, and random comments that the software decides it doesn't like for no discernible reason will be held for moderation.
[Be aware that for unknown reasons the software rejects comments shorter than 15 characters, so if you want to leave a short comment fill the gap with periods ........]
2 comments
Well you see, the Taliban isn’t criticizing the president, therefore they aren’t really a threat. Now, that Stephen Colbert fellow on th eother hand… he must be up to something.
Oh, yeah, Colbert got to assume he’s under surveillance coverage that hasn’t been seen since Gary Hart challenged the media to prove he was messing around.