This is wrong, but predictable: ‘Da Vinci Code’ success sparks ‘Angels & Demons’ plans.
Dan Brown wrote a boring book named Angels & Demons that no one read before he wrote the slightly less bad book that everyone read. Since the film from the less bad book is making money, they decided to “follow the formula”.
On-line Opinion Magazine featuring annoyed rumblings from the leading edge of the Baby Boom firmly tied to a reality-based world.
Established: 21 November 2004
The opinions expressed in Comments are those of the individuals making them. Truly absurd comments and opinions are subject to being cruelly mocked, but "flame wars" will take place on someone else's dime.
Your first comment, all comments with extensive links, and random comments that the software decides it doesn't like for no discernible reason will be held for moderation.
[Be aware that for unknown reasons the software rejects comments shorter than 15 characters, so if you want to leave a short comment fill the gap with periods ........]
4 comments
No. NO. NOOOO!
Well, maybe. DVC had too much violence and, for a book and movie allegedly about the reintegration of the feminine with the masculine in religion, too little sex. Could Angels and Demons possibly reverse that aspect of the formula?
The novel supposedly introduces the Tom Hanks character as a religious researcher out to solve crimes, or something. Now if he a cat…
Now if he a cat…
… or two cats
… and a hundred million dollar inheritance
… and lived in a converted octagonal barn 400 miles north of everywhere
…
Nah. You could never make any money on a story like that. 🙂
Well, not for more than 20 years, anyway.