Extradition And South America
The US has a major problem complaining about the possibility that South American nations might ignore a request to extradite Edward Snowden if he gets there.
The US refuses to extradite Luis Posada Carriles to Venezuela to face charges concerning the midair bombing of an airliner in 1976 that resulted in 73 deaths. Mr Posada entered the US illegally in 2005.
The US refuses to extradite Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada to Bolivia to answer charges related to the death of 59 protestors while he was president of the country.
The US refuses to extradite Roberto and William Isaias Dassum to face charges concerning bank fraud and embezzlement to Ecuador.
Given that Mr Snowden isn’t being charged in connection with mass murder or the largest bank failure in the history of the US, I don’t think these countries are impressed with US claims. You reap what you sow.
5 comments
LOL Yeah… really! 😀
But the USA is now a Country that believes that nothing it does is anyone else’s business, and that it is immune to any Law, even it’s own! 😆
“The ship of Fools”. 😉
Still, the law suites against the NSA are piling up. 😀 Here’s the latest:
Groups to fight NSA spying in court
I wouldn’t hold my breath… but who knows. 😉
Oh, and this one made me laugh! 😀 Regarding Verizon trying to get rid of copper and use only WiFi for comm’s, which indicators are that the FCC is leaning their way (big surprise there… Not!) The DoD and FAA are especially concerned about the idea. The FAA stated that if NY State transitions to all wireless communications, then NY State will have to close the airports. LOL
We like copper wire, DoD tells FCC
Ahhh… It can be truly said “Only in America!” 😉 😀
The FAA has a wired network and they can’t switch.
NYS won’t go along, because there just isn’t cell coverage for large areas of the state, much less Wifi, and while the FCC might go along, the NY Public Utilities Commission won’t. If they want to sell telephone service in NY they have to get approval from the PUC. The Feds may have a problem saying no to large corporations, but New York does it all the time.
The Supreme Court does not want to deal with this, and they will do whatever they can to avoid it. I don’t expect any help from them on this issue.
Here’s the latest. Sadly, only on YouTube, not in US MSM:
The grilling seen here, as given to woeful U.S. State Dept. spokesperson Jen Psaki during a daily press briefing earlier this week, came largely from AP’s Matthew Lee and CNN’s Elise Labott. They, and the others who were not identified in the RT (formerly “Russia Today”) YouTube posting description, deserve credit for their persistence…
‘US citizen has no right to free speech?’ State Dept spokesperson grilled over Snowden
About time too! 😀
Oh, and the full details via Wikileaks:
Statement by Edward Snowden to human rights groups at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport
I saw those earlier, I think McClatchy covered the news conference, but they are generally text only, and I read the transcript of his statement at Naked Capitalism or Corrente.
They have lost their minds over this, Kryten. Snowden was a hacker – there is absolutely no way he didn’t arrange an ‘insurance policy’, a data dump triggered if they grab him before he is ready to go. He hasn’t included any truly nasty stuff so far, and has been careful about what was released to avoid endangering anyone. He had access to everything, and he can certainly cause a lot pain to a lot of people if he wants to.
The wisest course would be to leave him alone and let everything die down for a few years. Let whatever he has become history, not current events. The people pushing this are total incompetents. They just can’t see the ‘game’ to its logical conclusion.
From the way Snowden seems to think, I have a gut feeling that a lot of what he has in his ‘insurance policy’ has more to do with politics that intel. People need to get it through their heads that NSA can tap every phone in the country.