Michael calls them: Persecution ninnies, the Christians who demand special treatment based on their version of “Christianity”.
If these whiners really supported religious freedom they would be helping Wiccans have their symbol become one of the approved emblems for grave markers at veterans’ cemeteries.
The Wiccans have a problem with religious persecution, the “ninnies” want societal permission to be rude and crude.
On-line Opinion Magazine featuring annoyed rumblings from the leading edge of the Baby Boom firmly tied to a reality-based world.
Established: 21 November 2004
The opinions expressed in Comments are those of the individuals making them. Truly absurd comments and opinions are subject to being cruelly mocked, but "flame wars" will take place on someone else's dime.
Your first comment, all comments with extensive links, and random comments that the software decides it doesn't like for no discernible reason will be held for moderation.
[Be aware that for unknown reasons the software rejects comments shorter than 15 characters, so if you want to leave a short comment fill the gap with periods ........]
8 comments
I notice there’s nothing there for the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers), either. I’m not sure what it would be since the RSOF doesn’t use symbols or icons. Perhaps a pair of shaking hands…? (The hat is out; it’s probably copyrighted by the cereal company.)
And yes, there are plenty of Quaker veterans. Not all of us are Conscientious Objectors, and many served in the armed forces in non-combat or service duties.
I don’t suppose that you could elaborate on what persecution actually means?
I mean, isn’t there still a Christian majority in this country?
I know you don’t like to be reminded, but Nixon was reputedly a Quaker and served in WWII. He is probably the best known Quaker veteran.
Van, that’s the problem: some Christians keep complaining about persecution but, most of the world can’t figure out what they mean beyond the fact that they aren’t a government funded organization. They just held a big conference down your way that all kinds of politicians attended to complain about “the war on Christians”.
Nixon’s mother was a Quaker, but I don’t recall ever hearing about him attending a meeting when he was in public office. And since he served in WWII, he was not an adherent to the Peace Testimony.
There are several branches of Quakers, including — get this — evangelical Quakers who also have a clergy and spoken service. I think Mrs. Nixon was from that group. They are an off-shoot of the original “orthodox” Quakers from Philadelphia, which is the branch I align with.
I am a Catholic Christian, and I have caught heck from the fundies for being Catholic, because you know, Catholics are not really Christian. That’s it. No one has ever told me I could not go to church, or anything else. Much ado about NOTHING.
I have relatives who are “four walls and a sermon” Christians who are suspicious of crosses as possible idols, genuine iconoclasts in the old Puritan tradition.
There is something about the concept of evangelical Quakers that is dissonant, a “ripple in the Force”.
People forget, Lark, that the second version of the Klan attacked Jews, Catholics, and immigrants, as well as blacks. America hasn’t been majority WASP for some time, but people refuse to accept that reality.
When of the things that is bothering the Religious Reich is the fact that they are not growing with the population. The membership in the Southern Baptist Convention has been flat for a decade.
Our Quaker meeting has a paid minister and structured service – but we’re most definitely NOT evangelical. The meeting down the road would qualify for that, plus several others I could name. Lots of variation amongst meetings, just as in any denomination.
But to the point – I estimate that a good 80% of our male membership over the age of 80 (not many of those left) are WWII vets. We even have a few Korean War vets and a couple who saw service in Viet Nam. They are all good, peaceable Quaker gentlemen who wouldn’t hurt a fly.
But they saw a legitimate need for military service at the time, and answered the call.
To my knowledge – and as I’m the meeting secretary, I should know – we only have one member on active duty or in the reserves at the moment…he’s in the Coast Guard in Minnesota. Apparently, nobody is seeing a legitimate need to put aside their Peace Testimony at this time.
That should probably be a values check on any war: are Quakers willing to fight?